Separate bicycle infrastructure makes traffic safer but only if it is designed right. The Netherlands has the highest percentage of trips made by bicycle and its streets are the safest in the world*. It is doing something right. Many years of experience have eliminated design flaws in cycle infrastructure and the high use of it has resulted in a type of design that has proven to be much safer. Other countries are now developing their own bicycle infrastructure and could make good use of the expertise the Netherlands obtained over decades.

    In this video a closer look at the design of large junctions with separate bicycle paths. The position of waiting cyclists: in view of drivers, the way green cycles work, and the separation of types of traffic also on the junction itself, make all the difference.

    see blog http://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/junction-design-for-safer-cycling-netherlands/

    * See: http://hembrow.blogspot.com/2009/05/worlds-safest-roads.html

    people opposing separate cycling for structure often argue that separate psychopaths are dangerous when it comes to crossing out of traffic on junctions in the Netherlands this is not true it has the safest streets in the world even though it also has the highest number of vulnerable cyclists so what is different about Dutch junctions when we look at Junction design this becomes clear a typical junction without any cycle provisions will look like this the most hazardous action for any traffic is to make a left turn a car will turn left like this but the cyclist will have to cross two lanes of traffic first traffic that approaches from behind so looking over the shoulder is necessary this is a particularly dangerous thing to do in left driving countries this is the case for white turns and we can see how unclear and dangerous the situation on this Junction in London becomes when just two cyclists make such a turn hoping to make junctions safer some countries started to paint cycle lanes on them examples can be found in Denmark in Germany and recently on London’s cycles superhighways but does this really make a Junction safer the cyclists still has to share the road and has a conflict with right turning cars the left turning cyclist is then expected to wait in a corner of the junction until it is clear of motorized traffic the waiting area is not shielded in any way making this way to potentially dangerous cyclists can only continue to turn when the lives have changed to green for the other direction thus creating an extra conflict with cars will turn right from that other direction this is not the solution the Dutch prefer a typical junction in the Netherlands looks like this note that the separate cycle paths also exist on the junction itself this gives the cyclist a protected waiting area for crossing the path of motorised traffic and also a completely free right turn the waiting area for the cyclist is very advanced so always in good view of turning cars cyclists have their own traffic light that has a different green cycle from right turning cars this eliminates that conflict hugely the green light is combined with the green cycle for left turning cars so the cyclist can make the full left turn all at once if cyclists do have to wait they are shielded from motorized traffic by the traffic islands in every corner of the junction it is provisions like these that make cycling in the Netherlands safer than anywhere else in the world

    30 Comments

    1. I think the main reason the Dutch solution is not used more is space. The Dutch solution moves the cycle track back from the road by a few feet and those feet have to come from somewhere. If a parking lane exists it normally becomes a right turn lane at the junction so those extra feet have to come from peds where they need it most. There are ways to keep the waiting area in the blue colored diagram away from right turning traffic by moving the crosswalk back a few feet and using that space.

    2. For rural and suburban areas with open space on all corners, yes, there is no excuse for not using the Dutch solution. My problem is with urban areas with buildings on all corners. Frequently the lanes are already at the bare minimum of 10' and snipping any more feet from traffic lanes will cause trucks to have difficulties. And because everyone is a ped at the end of their trip, even cyclists, and because some trips are too close or too far to cycle, there will still be peds.

    3. Excellent video, thank you. I do not find it hard to believe that this design might reduce collisions, but is there good research on this? Research elsewhere has shown that the rate of collisions is greater for cyclists on cycle tracks than in the street; that cycle tracks increase the number of cyclists; and that the rate of collisions declines as the number of cyclists increase. Is the low rate of collisions in the Netherlands a result of better design, of larger numbers of cyclists, or both?

    4. Another option – one that is implemented in most junctions with traffic lights in Groningen for example – is to have all cycling and pedestrian traffic lights be green at the same time, with all other traffic lights red (obviously). Because they take up much less space and are more maneuverable than cars it's easy for groups of cyclists to pass through each other from all sides simultaneously at large junctions. It also means that cars never have to worry about cyclists, and vice versa.

    5. Something about the UK "Stupidhighways" – the video implies right turning cyclists will perform a hook turn manouvre, but the only places this is officially supported is where there is a "toucan crossing" shared with pedestrians. Cyclists can sometimes perform such turns unofficially, but they are usually expected to manouvre to the right hand lane even when there is some vague gesture at a cycle lane along the gutter.

    6. @jeremyhull most likely both, combined with the fact most drivers are also riders, which greatly increases the understanding between the two.

      If you speak dutch or you are really interested you might be interested in some writings of the CROW (crow.nl). This is the dutch organisation which develops, researches and maintains the design of the dutch road infrastructure. Who knows, you might be the one to introduce it in your country 🙂

    7. This should be standard in the larger North American cities, especially at high volume intersections. Junctions like this should literally be endorsed as the "new cloverleaf". Great video.

    8. @aussiekwv there is no traffic light pole in the middle of the cycle path. The path is red, the pedestrian area is light gray. People in wheel chairs can use the pedestrian area or the cycle path, depends on what type of wheel chair or scooter they use. The traffic light should indeed not have been positioned in the pedestrian area. But the junction was being reconstructed so it may have been changed later.

    9. But even in this very advanced dutch crossing users of a bicycle will have to wait two times for a green light (if turning left) – whilst a car only have to wait for one light change.

    10. In 2:48 he says that usually the green light for cyclists is combined with green light for left turning cars, so: no, cyclists do not have to wait twice when turning left, only once.

    11. This is BS. It's a complicated system to solve a nonexistent problem. If cyclists use integrated cycling techniques, the result is a simple system that works perfectly well. I know, because I've been using it for over 30 years without a single incident. The idea that British and American cyclists will just roll over and accept a system that places them in a kinder and gentler discriminatory system is, frankly, offensive.

    12. Its amazing how we in New Zealand force helmets on the most laid back of cyclist, but as far as I am now considering. We have done nothing to insure cyclist safety!

    13. This is not BS, you have to live there to understand how the system is working. I live for the last 35 years here in Canada and still to day, they don't know how to manage the cycling population. They are only focused on cars instead on the two wheelers.

      Hendrik

    14. Thanks for sharing all these videos, my country is years away from this type of infrastructure, we are in the phase of painted lanes but now I have some good examples to quote to make a more informed opinion when people ask me from the cyclist point of view. Well done 🙂

    15. no cell phones, manual transmissions, no eating in cars , no putting on makeup while driving that sounds like the Netherlands not the USA or Canada. Riding a bike in Canada is like riding a suicide mission lmfao.

    16. I wish Sadiq Khan would watch this video! We are so behind in our cycling infrastructure here in the UK, makes me want to move to the Netherlands just to experience it!

    Leave A Reply