They have serial number and look real but I cant find them on o-review when I type the number. I am curious maybe it is some prototyp model but not sure.
Hold the lens in front of some print and see if it’s distorted compared to the part before the edge of the lens.
I know real Oakleys won’t distort it – some fakes certainly will.
Stephennnnnn on
They look sorta fake but I could be wrong. Arms look a little janky
sonygoup on
Look fake I have same model but in black
AustenP92 on
I would say they’re very fake just on first impression alone. The plastic has a cheap vibe to it, the blue Oakley O on the frames looks to be the wrong color. It should match the lens with being shiny/kind of metallic, not be made in the same color as the blue arm accents.
Then onto the serial number, which is why I would say they’re absolutely a fake. The round O’s to start look correct, and 9471 is for encoders.
However, the 1036 following is what throws me off. Those numbers relate to lens width, then bridge with. A lens width of 10 makes no sense. And these numbers are always separated by an Oakley O. The last number is temple length, which may night be far off. But I find it ironic it’s “123”.
Based on pictures along, without a doubt they’re fake. Why someone would make a fake in the same colour way is beyond me. Maybe it’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing type of situation.
4 Comments
Hold the lens in front of some print and see if it’s distorted compared to the part before the edge of the lens.
I know real Oakleys won’t distort it – some fakes certainly will.
They look sorta fake but I could be wrong. Arms look a little janky
Look fake I have same model but in black
I would say they’re very fake just on first impression alone. The plastic has a cheap vibe to it, the blue Oakley O on the frames looks to be the wrong color. It should match the lens with being shiny/kind of metallic, not be made in the same color as the blue arm accents.
Then onto the serial number, which is why I would say they’re absolutely a fake. The round O’s to start look correct, and 9471 is for encoders.
However, the 1036 following is what throws me off. Those numbers relate to lens width, then bridge with. A lens width of 10 makes no sense. And these numbers are always separated by an Oakley O. The last number is temple length, which may night be far off. But I find it ironic it’s “123”.
Based on pictures along, without a doubt they’re fake. Why someone would make a fake in the same colour way is beyond me. Maybe it’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing type of situation.