The CXN100 is a new streamer from Cambridge Audio. How does it compare to the market leaders, the Eversolo DMP-A6 and the Bluesound Node X? I find out…

    Link to sponsor MCRU – Use discount code BA10 for 10% off:

    Home 2023

    Link to manufacturer’s webpage:
    https://www.cambridgeaudio.com/gbr/en/products/hi-fi/cx-series/cxn100

    Link to my Patreon:
    https://www.patreon.com/abritishaudiophile

    Related reviews:
    HEAD TO HEAD! Eversolo DMP A6 Vs Bluesound Node X

    £1,000 DAC Group Test

    HIT THE SWEET SPOT! Q Acoustics 5020 Speaker Review

    HOW GOOD IS IT? Eversolo DMP-A8 Streamer Review

    Time stamps:
    0:00 Intro
    2:22 Design & build
    4:14 Connectivity
    7:38 User interface
    9:36 Sound quality
    13:40 Conclusion

    This video is sponsored by mcru manufacturers of the Main’s distribution block and power cords used by a British audio file for more information click the link in the description and use discount code ba10 for 10% off your order last year there was a disturbance

    In the force well as far as the sub 1000 streamers are concerned it seemed that ever solo came out of nowhere and captured the hearts and minds of many Hi-Fi enthusiasts judging by how quickly it went out of stock it captured their wallets as well I’m not surprised for

    £59 the DMP A6 offers comprehensive connectivity a CNC machine aluminium chassis and a 6-in 150 mm touchscreen color LCD display all that may have seemed previously unimaginable at this price it’s also a very good sounding device good enough to pip the blue sound node X for my source component of the

    Year in 2023 in the sub 1000 category but those of you who watch my original review where I pitched those two streamers head-to-head will have noted that neither of them won my top outstanding award and that’s because both have quite a bit of Sonic coloration the DMP A6 can sound lean and

    Even bright in certain systems whereas the blue sound node X has a distinctly warm character that means that some care needs to be taken with partner equipment it also means that there’s some room for improvement I wonder if Cambridge audio looked upon the success of the ever solo DMP A6 and

    Felt the need to respond the result being the new cxn 100 streamer that replaces the outgoing cxn V2 model a point to note I structure my streamer reviews these days a little bit differently than I do speakers amplifiers and other source components and that’s because there’s a little bit

    More to consider with regards to the user interface and connectivity naturally I’m still fundamentally interested and how the unit is designed and how it sounds and I’m sure you can tell from looking over my shoulder that the ever solo DMP A6 and the blue sound

    Node X are still here so I was able to do extensive AB listening tests between all these streamers so is the new Cambridge audio cxn 100 the streamer to beat in the sub 1000 category conventional is the best way to describe The Styling of the cxn 100 it’s

    A full rack width unit that unassumingly blends in with other Cambridge audio components from the cxn ax range according to Cambridge audio the cxn 100 is a ground up redesign rather than a revision of the old cxn V2 featuring the Gen 4 stream magic module and ditching the old wolson D chip for

    An ESS saber 9028 q2m for the £ 899 outlay The cxn 100 lives up to expectations rather than exceeds them the front facia is metal and the chassis is from the standard thin folded steel you get on many accessibly priced products in contrast the 759b ever solo

    DMP A6 has much thicker plates of aluminium that constitute the casework it still defines the standard for build quality in this class inside the DMP A6 uses two ESS saber 9038 q2m chips for independent digital to analog conversion of the left and right channels the casework of the 699 blue S

    Node X is all plastic but it’s a much smaller device and has the kind of understated styling that will sit elegantly on a sideboard or desk the blue sound node X also uses the same da chip as the Cambridge audio cxn 100 a single ESS saber 9028

    Q2m I think Personal Taste and use case scenario you’re going to determine which of these streamers you’re going to find the most appealing to look at for example it’s going to be different at the end of a desk or in a Hi-Fi rack but as far as overall design and build

    Quality is concerned I have to give that to the ever solo the cxn 100 will stream internet radio it supports diesa cobz tidal and Spotify but apps like apple music Amazon and BBC sounds can only currently be accessed via AirPlay or chomecast the stream Magic app can also be bypassed to

    Use with Bluetooth Spotify connect tidal connect and Rune as for Hardware connections flanking the ethernet RJ45 Network Port are two USB inputs one to use with drives containing music and the other is a PC input there are Optical and Co axle digital inputs if you want

    To use the cxn 100 as a deck or you can use the op and Co axle digital outputs to connect to an external Dack the analog outputs are on the right you have single-ended RCA and balanced XLR the only benefit of balanced XLR analog outputs on a device like this is

    If you’re running long cable runs for example if it’s sat on a sideboard well away from the rest of your Hi-Fi equipment I see a full rack width unit like this more likely to find its home in a Hi-Fi equipment rack and for that reason I’d have preferred that the money

    That went into producing analog balanced XLR outputs have gone into something like HDMI e that’s because I see a lot of people using this as a digital Hub and having HDMI e means that you can use your TV remote to switch on and switch off this device as well as adjust the

    Volume it’s a really convenient feature especially when no remote control is offered as standard with the cxn 100 it’s an optional accessory for 25 the thing is that this device has two digital USB inputs one one to connect to a PC but presently no asynchronous USB

    Output and that means you have to rely on the coaxial and optical digital inputs if you’re connecting it to an external Dack those inputs are sometimes referred to as spedi and the issue is it’s the streamer’s clock rather than the Dax clock that’s responsible for the exchange of information the likelihood

    Is if you’re considering an external DAC as a performance upgrade it’s likely to have a better clock than the one inside this streamer I suppose one way of considering it is that weird inputs the DAC is reacting to things that are thrown at it as opposed to requesting

    Information and having it received the cxm 100 also has no headphone input just like the ever solo DMP A6 but I feel it’s less of an issue on a full rack width unit that is less likely to be used as a desktop solution the DMP A6 has a host of

    Digital connections including both a USB input and output but bizarrely they opted for HDMI multi- Channel output rather than HDMI e input something that I’m sure ever solo are regretting now for such a compact device I have to commend blue sound for making the smartest choices when it comes to

    Connectivity on the Node X not only is there a headphone socket on the front but there’s HDMI e on the rear and the USB port can be used as an input for external drives or as an output for Dax the 3 1/2 mm optical Port even doubles

    Up as an analog input so at superficial glance it may seem that the ever solo dm6 has the best connectivity but the most useful connections are on the blue sound node X the cxm 100 has a nice color LCD display which is a bit smaller than the

    One on the ever solo DMP A6 there are three buttons on either side that allow access to basic functionality on the left to play pause skip forward and backwards through through tracks on the right to cycle through display screens and toggle between inputs it’s a shame that for other functions including accessing the

    Streamer you’re forced to rely upon the stream Magic app although it is fast reliable and intuitively laid out I had no problems with dropouts or the system crashing but the graphical interface is pretty basic similar to what I experienced with the Denon morance heal system the blue sound node X is even

    More basic when it comes to directly interacting with a device no screen to display art just proximity controls that allow up to five presets to be stored volume adjustment play pause and track shuffling in both directions but the Blue-ray system is a lot more advanced than Cambridge audio

    Stream magic it has a more sophisticated graphical interface where you can customize screens it’s still the only UI out of these three streamers that allows you to create playlists across platforms and that’s something that I look for as for the ever solo DMP A6 well it just seems to keep getting better with

    Firmware updates the touchscreen display is a joy to interact with putting much more expensive streamers to shame a parametric EQ has been added since my review in November 20123 once again I had trouble getting the DMP A6 to connect to my iPad and had to rely on my Samsung phone so ever solo

    Still have some compatibility fo balls to iron out but the app worked like a dream on my phone the graphics and layout being all you would wish for from an Android based system you have to hand it to Cambridge audio they really do know how to make

    Nice sounding devices in the context of price appropriate systems it’s a very well balanced sounding unit I’m talking about speakers and amplifiers that individually retail for less than £1,000 tonally it sits just a little bit on the warm side but not as far as the blue

    Sound node X which has a more relaxed presentation it’s certainly closer to that than it is the cooler sounding ever solo DMP A6 I hooked it up to one of my favorite combinations of accessibly priced speakers and amplifiers the 599 lb Q acoustic 5020s and the 449 lb Iota VX

    Sa3 I did try substituting the sa3 for the Cambridge audio xa35 but the rich sounding axa35 doesn’t pair well with the slightly warm sounding 5020s so I switched back to the Iota amplifier to restore balance switching to the ever solo DMP A6 I could hear better resolution it was

    Most noticeable in terms of bass control and Precision in imaging but that leanness that the ever Sola also has to its Sonic presentation was present so I exchanged for the blue sound node X which gave out the Widder Sound Stage and the boldest space but the mid-range

    Was also a little bit too relaxed I guess if I was choosing a streamer in the context of this Q acoustic Iota system for long-term listening satisfaction it would be the Cambridge audio cxn 100 things were a little different as I increased the price point to the 1400b amphan Argon 1es coupled to

    My 1,850 exposure 2510 by the way the price of both of those components has gone up recently the Cambridge audio cxn 100 sounded inoffensive but it also clear that it was struggling for overall Fidelity in this company I appreciated the extra scale and Authority that the blue sound node X delivered but it

    Sounded way too soft and colored as for the ever solo DMP A6 it offered good resolution the sound was pretty much between the speakers but that coolness that it has to the sound was now edging towards being bright and harsh and that’s my point I couldn’t live with any

    Of these three streamers in the context of that exposure ampian system and that’s why as your system improves not only do they need to function as streamers but also streaming transports so it was time to insert my favorite deck for circa £1,000 and see if the denps Aries 12-1 could save the

    Day the ever solo sounded terrible through its Optical and Co axal digital outputs but USB was a different story there was much better body to the mid-range and it sounded more open and refined as for the blue sound well well the resolution improved again considerably when connected to the denps

    DAC through its USB output but it was still just a little bit too soft for my liking well how about the Cambridge audio cxn 100 which as I pointed out earlier doesn’t have an asynchronous USB output so I had to rely on the co axle and Optical connections and let the

    Streamer’s clock take charge this was the biggest surprise of the test I don’t want to get too technical but performance here is all about Jitter and Noise and despite the fact that the cxn 100 doesn’t have an asynchronous USB output Fidelity improved considerably not quite the

    Resolution of the ever solo DMP A6 but better refinement and certainly better as a strewing transport than the blue sound node X I have to hand it to Cambridge audio they clearly have done an excellent job of implementing their spedi digital outputs I wasn’t expecting that but I still wish they’ included a

    USB digital output one final thing before I move on using the cxn 100 as a digital preamp didn’t impact on performance so I wouldn’t have any hesitation hooking up this device directly to a power amplifier or powered speakers the Cambridge audio cxn 100 streamer is a viable alternative to the

    Ever solo DMP A6 and the blue sound modde X it offers a more balanced sound than either of those two whether used as a streamer or streaming transport it doesn’t sound as resolving as the ever Solo or have the scale of the blue sound nor will the user

    Interface live up to the experience of either of those two Brands even though the streaming app is fast stable and gets the job done I guess I choose this streamer over the other two if I was pretty happy with the sound that was coming out of my speakers and amplifier

    And I didn’t want to shift the tonal balance too much in One Direction or another I think price is a little bit of an issue at £ 899 I don’t think it just ifies the extra outlay over the node X or the DMP A6 but you might be able to find it on

    Sale to get better parity all said this is a solid product the Cambridge audio cxn 100 gets a recommended from this channel my question for today is what features do you look for in a streamer please let me know in the comment section it’ be a nice discussion to have

    All That Remains for me to say is if you like what I’m doing with this channel you want to see it grow and assuming you haven’t done so already please like share subscribe hit the Bell notification check me out on patreon there’s a couple of consultancy tiers

    You can access there if you think I can help you on your audio file Journey also check out the ABA Club on patreon which has some great ways to interact with me and fellow patreons but for today for now a British audio file signing off

    48 Comments

    1. Thanks for the video. Appreciate the insight into the build quality and internal components. The comparisons are very helpful. I’m leaning towards the Bluesound for a new system and your input helps. I have a Bluesound N130 now and have a positive experience connecting Qobuz into my Rotel preamp controlling with both my iPad and iPhone. I use the better DAC in the Rotel. The connectivity, ease of use and warm sound and cost will work for me. To answer your question, I look for the connections I need, ease of use with the operating system, the quality of the sound and the cost.

    2. As an IotaVX PA3 owner, it was nice to see it appear here.
      As a cheaper all in one digital source – how would you rate the IotaVX NP3 compare in this comparison(HDMI aside) – especially as it is running with the WiiM software?

    3. good comarisons – needed very much 🙂
      Taurn, need to ask you one related question – if I already get Eversolo A6 which I'm happy about but would like to upgrade in a simple path – is this better to add external Everolo Z8 (A6+Z8 very nice looking both) or exchange for A8 (which is costly overall and price/performance I'm not so sure if this is the best – as it's already price point of Lumins) ? my understaning is that stack A6+Z8 is somwhere between A6 and A8 but better overal then A6 ME? am I right ? do you have some other recomendation of external DAC for A6? Thanks a lot !

    4. Thank you for your thorough review.

      At first, I liked that Cambridge had tone control and HDMI Arc.

      Second, I have a CXA 81 + CXN V2 and would like to upgrade my system to a CXN 100 and a power amplifier that has XLR inputs, such as the IOTAVX AVXP 2-840.

      I would be very grateful if I know your opinion.

      also

      EverSOLO DMP-A8

      I have in mind

      Thank you

    5. I suppose to enjoy the BluOS app in a streamer of greater quality than the Node we are heading to NAD? I look for sound quality and a good user interface though a screen is not essential if the app works. Thank you for a comprehensive overview.

    6. The biggest concern in my house is a device running an unknown operatng system on my network, with unrestricted access to the internet. I have enough trouble with mainstream devices that are well maintained, so I fear a niche product built on a framework of convenience rather than one of security is going to be a liability. Thanks for the reviews Tarun, I like your style.

    7. £900 for the Cambridge audio streamer seems terrible value, even at half the price I wouldn't buy it. It's just a big empty box.

      I would buy a Wiim streamer and a separate DAC, and still have plenty of money left over.

    8. I agree that the once maligned HDMI input should be standard on all gear including high end products. A lot of people have their main stereo and TV in the same room and like to hook up the monitor through the main system. The sound is glorious when watching well produced shows like "Life on Our Planet with Morgan Freeman". The music sound tracks on movies jump out in full fidelity that puts the best soundbars to shame.
      p..s. I like full size components.

    9. …why should I have to buy an audio streamer with and internal dac and then buy an another dac? Could you suggest an upper class streamer?

    10. Great review and comparison! I’ve been considering the CXN 100, but it sounds like it might not be a good match (based on price/specs) for my Technics SU-R1000 and Sonus Faber Olympica Nova II speakers. 🤔

    11. Thank you. Really appreciate you explanation of clock sources for USB vs. SPDIF. Been around higher end audio for multiple decades and still have things to learn/understand. Thanks again!

    12. The app cant compete with bluos (with its subwoofer management etc) or the eversolo so thats a hard pass.
      The UI for a streamer is everything.
      I have 3 Nodes (all as transports) and you can link them or create local areas etc. Way more versatile.

    13. A very balanced and fair comparison. My hearing tops out at 8500 hz so I don't seem to hear the HF edge that you and Darko mention. I do think SQ of dmp A6 is better than Node 2i (2019). SSD storage of the A6 is a bonus for those w large ripped CD collections.

    14. This was very telling! Always a bit surprising what results from different topologies and use of digital outs. For me, something that concentrates on high quality clocking and Ethernet filtering/galvanic isolation. Also one with solid output options and attention to detail there in terms of quality signal to an outboard Dac. Or no internal Dac for that matter (dedicated design).

    15. When nearly everyone uses a tablet or smartphone to control a streamer, why is there any need for a display on the unit itself. Just a distraction if listening in the dark and a waste of money, A display may produce electronic noise or interfearance whitin the streamer. I really like your channel, and this is just an oppinion, not a critscism.

    16. another great video,your channel is the best audiophile,i have the BOWERS N WILKINS 606 S2,could you please recommend a few intergrated amplifiers to make these speakers sound there best,i have between £350 and £700 to spend,many thanks

    17. Thank you for the excellent review. I was wondering whether you use different streaming services when doing these comparisons, and if so, whether you feel there is any differences in sound quality between Tidal, Qobuz, Apple and Amazon?

    18. Features in streaming, well, that depends. In my case the audio set is not visible. I don't really want to see the audio set when I'm listening, but I do want a pleasant sound 😉. Partly because of this channel, I ultimately decided on a stream set of several separate parts; Bluesound N130 with PD creative separate power supply and new board inside the Bluesound, asynchronously connected via USB to a Denafrips Hermes DDC. Added up, I arrive at €2100, for which I could, for example, have bought a HifiRose 250A with a few 100 euros more. That HifiRose is a beautiful device, but I wouldn't see it from my listening position. I also play quite a lot of CDs and my Audiolab 6000 CD transport also uses the DDC, and the DDC provides an extremely neat connection to the Pontus II via i2s, which therefore sounds optimal with both CD and Bluesound.

    19. Sorry I’m late to this. I have to say how well you deliver your reviews. Technical explanations are always top notch. I use multiple WiiM pro as a digital transport. Coax out to my dacs. The dacs are Geshelli J2 with Sparkos update and Ladder Schumann. The WiiMs deliver the best Ui as far as I can see. You can connect to Amazon, Tidal, Qobuz, etc. The “connect” functions work flawlessly as well. The fact that there are Apple connectivity issues would rule the A6 out. These companies need to get an agreement with Amazon. Air Play is less than competent.

    20. A/V friendly is what I look for. My current amp programs for 2 outputs: !. Stereo LFE at 140W/Channel and 2. 7.2.4 at 100W/channel. It also has every connect imaginable baring balanced.

    21. I have the Cambridge V2 partnered with the Cambridge 851a in my snug, you will have to spend some, to better it . The V2 is also super in pre-amp mode with d class amplification .
      Your detail is top notch Tarun .

    22. Thanks Tarun, another great review. I now understand more about the benefits of using USB output. I currently have the Node (not X version) in combination with an Audiolab 6000A, but I am looking to upgrade in the near future. I realise that I will probably end up upgrading all my separates, not just the amplifier and speakers. Any plans to review any streamers in the 1-2 K bracket?

    23. I think the API is very important, too. I did not see any review which talks about it. It would be great if this would me compared more, whioch also would encourage the makeres to invest here.
      The eversolo has an API which allows controlling features of the streamer by sending http requests sent from a device on the same network. So you cantrol it from a simple HTML + java script project. For my own needs, I developed a Windows program which makes it possible to select which track to play from its internal SSD (not using DLNA).
      I also found out that the parametric EQ can help with bright speakers – the KEF LS50 were tamed with a setting which reduces >18K a bit and now sound is great and full.

    24. I always enjoy your videos Tarun… streamers tho… I just can’t see myself streaming music. I’ve no idea how they compare sonically to my records & CD’s, but it’s the format I can’t warm to. I have to have an album or even a CD cover. Prehistoric I know, but I can’t help how I feel about them 🎵🎶😎👊🏻

    25. I have the Node X for headphone listening. I am happy with what it does for my needs. I have the CNX V1 in my office system paired with a CXA80 and a CXC. I love that system. I have rarely been able to find products that check all my boxes, so then it comes down to what I value the most. Thanks again.

    26. Are you aware of any reviews of the different streaming services? I currently use Spotify on my built in ceiling Sonos (audio) setup but what would be a good subscription for the hifi system? How do different services compare in sound quality, ease of use and size of library?

    27. I have the 2021 bluesound node feeding Musical fidelity a5 pre/power recapped amps and into Dali Epicon 6. So chain is quite high end but source isn't. Given I mainly stream spotify for ease of use and discovery, a) would you upgrade the streamer or just buy a separate dac (and if so, what price point / ideas should I be looking at) or b) not bother as it's only spotify. Thks

    28. Thanks Tarun, the most important things I looked for when I bought my streamer was gapless playback and a proper handoff from the mobile device used to control it. I did not want the stream to pass through the phone or tablet, which is something that some streamers do (eg dts Play-fi as used in Audiolab kit).

    29. A long time viewer of your content Tarun, and a big fan.
      Apologies for asking but would you be able to give an opinion please as to which of these models might fit my usage best?
      Amp = Audiolab 6000a
      Speakers = Dali Oberon 5
      I listen to classical music and want great instruments separation, timbre, soundstage and detail retrieval. I can’t handle brightness in the upper mids/treble as I have tinnitus.
      Would really appreciate your advice.
      By the way a screen is not a necessity for me as I use a 10” tablet
      Thanks

    30. Hello Tarun
      I see that you are going to start some reviews for the speaker range of $3000 – $4000 dollars in upcoming postings. Can you possibly try to include the Q Acoustics Concept 50 floor standing model? I took your previous advice and upgraded my speakers and amplifier (HEGEL) H190.
      Thanks for the great reviews.

    31. Best to review these 3 streamers is to tabulate the features of these streamers then explain them with all the features side by side.

    Leave A Reply