It’s time to reimagine how we use our roads.
For more by Tomorrow’s Build subscribe now – https://bit.ly/3vOOJ98
Narrator – Fred Mills
Producer – Jaden Urbi
Video Editing and Graphics – Thomas Canton
Executive Producers – Fred Mills and Graham MacAree
Special thanks to Pekka Tahkola and Jill Warren. Additional footage and images courtesy of Pekka Tahkola, European Cyclists’ Federation, Conrad Poirier, State Records NSW, Don O’Brien, U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Estormiz, Daniel Capilla, LabExp, Richard Masoner / Cyclelicious, Kenneth C. Zirkel, Jim.henderson, Bart Everson, Guilhem Vellut, Dietmar Rabich, Google Earth and OpenStreetMaps.
Get more from Pekka’s YouTube channel and Twitter here:
https://bit.ly/3sDRLNA
https://bit.ly/3Jqid3R
Follow us on Twitter – https://twitter.com/TomorrowsBuild/
Like us on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/TomorrowsBuild/
Follow us on LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/company/TomorrowsBuild/
Follow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/TomorrowsBuild/
#construction #architecture #cycling
Tomorrow’s Build is owned and operated by The B1M Limited. We welcome you sharing our content to inspire others, but please be nice and play by our rules: http://www.theb1m.com/guidelines-for-sharing
Our content may only be embedded onto third party websites by arrangement. We have established partnerships with domains to share our content and help it reach a wider audience. If you are interested in partnering with us please contact Enquiries@TheB1M.com.
Ripping and/or editing this video is illegal and will result in legal action.
© 2022 The B1M Limited
44 Comments
Thank you! It was a pleasure to work with you for this video. Hope some day you can actually come over, visit Oulu and see it all with your own eyes, on a bicycle of course! 🥰🥰☃🚲💨
Omg how freaking obvious and fantastic “the contractor is bonused or sanctioned based on customer satisfaction“
Segregation is good! Things I didn't expect to hear…
I read about Oulu in Tom Babin's Frostbike. Valid points from Pekka in the book too.
If brexit is so bad maybe we'll all end up on bikes in the UK. Doubtful I'll be getting my licence back so I can live with that. Trouble is too many Richard littlejohn anti cyclists in audis with no respect for anything doing the speed limit.
Damn dirty hippies…
great video🚲🚴🚴♂
Well from the Dutch perspective, its all good and well that countries are adopting their cycling infra, but constant improvement is not in the cards for these countries.
The white bicycle plan and the money white wash.
It will be gone if we don't start using wind powered cars and stop farting by 2024. Shame on the ipod generation
its good bike 18 speed land ANTARCTIC went runing every day
I recently moved to three acres up the country. In rural Canada without a car!
This week I made a 20KM round trip to get the mail and beer and coffee cream.
Only in rather warm weather and clear roads. Not today after last nights snowstorm.
How does doing deliveries by bicycle work out in oulu, if lots of the paths are seperated from the streets? Would you have to ride on the roads, and are there good cycle lanes there too?
The path infrastructure is important. However, the secure bike parking infrastructure is important as well. Bike theft is a real issue in many places.
In Poland they mostly just add the bike lanes to the sidewalks, instead of the roads.
it rain to much in dk to cykel all year 😀
What a GREAT, informative video. I learned about segregated bike paths that appear in Europe but not so commonly here in the States, perceived safety and allocation of space. I love how Pekka rides along at a clip while talking about his urban planning ideas. That's a hoot.
As someone who bikes to work in a city in the Netherlands, I can say that – for the most part – the infrastructure is good. But the fact that I have to dodge ghost driving maniacs on bike roads on a near daily basis makes it more dangerous than taking the car. The worst offenders are those who ghost drive in the dark, with no headlight on, too busy checking their phone and making a wild direction change as a result. I've had to avoid multiple such crashes, crazy as it sounds.
So getting people on the bike and providing them with the proper infrastructure is one thing, but dedicated policing must be taken into account. There's a reason the Netherlands has more deaths on a bike than when driving a car.
It looks like Oulu followed Stevenage, which built cycleways in the 1950's. Except it sounds like they were much more successful encouraging people to bike.
There is more to building a bicycling community than just installing bike lanes. Bike lanes are not reasons to bike, they remove reasons NOT to bike: streets without bike lanes are dangerous (car crashes) and they are a hassle (drivers abuse cyclists with honking and aggressive driving). So, if we remember our high school math, a double negative becomes a positive. << -(-4) = +4 >> Bike lanes remove a danger and a hassle, two ways they are a double negative that becomes a positive. Bike lanes reduce and eliminate both of these concerns but don't do a lot to encourage people to bike by themselves.
Encouraging people to bike means involving the local culture, which means people find reasons to bike. Their favourite music might be about bicycles, they meet and talk cycling at a cafe or if they meet to fix their bikes together. But there is more that can happen to encourage bicycling.
Everyone knows about how Henry Ford built assembly lines to build their cars more inexpensively. But it was bicycle makers who first used assembly lines. It made sense because bikes are cheap, people will not pay as much for a bike as they will for a car, so it was a necessity to build bicycles cheaper. But bicycles have other advantages for innovation. They don't need to meet the same high safety standards as cars because they are inherently less dangerous. So testing a new design of a bicycle does not mean building dozens of them just for crash testing and if they did the bikes would be less expensive as well. Bikes are simple enough that they can be custom built in a garage or a basement or the backyard shed. And that means everyone can customize features on an existing bike, modify an existing bike or make one completely from scratch. All the customized bikes can be tested for durability, functionality and style. And all custom bikes can be used as prototypes for production. This affects local economies. The innovation and creation of new bike designs is not limited to engineers and RND departments of corporations (like Ford). So bicycles don't all need to be shipped in from China. Each local community can make custom bikes and prototypes to suit needs they encounter locally. Blend this culture of innovation into the local cycling community and we grow local economies and diversify cycling to the point where when someone says they don't want to ride a bike, they will mean a road bike or a mountain bike but there will be bikes they do like. And that reinforces more cycling in the community.
I live in a country, or area, with many bike paths alongside main roads or just straight throug nature sometimes, where cycling even draws in many tourists with bike shops renting out modern ebikes for example. Makes way more sense then building electric cars for the whole gobal population, cause the people and our environment would stay healthier as a side effect of it.
That sounds great, especially since it's planned like that from the beginning.
A lot of cities now start taking away space from other modes of traffic to create bike lanes, which is way way worse and creates a lot of tension.
I absolutely hate my own bike being turned into a political weapon against my car. They whould be brothers, not enemies.
This would be a colossal waste of infrastructure spending in most US cities, and everyone pushing for it knows it.
One important thing to "they will come" is to make sure the cycling network makes sense. A lot of the "pandemic" infrastructure was designed like "oh, hey, here is a little bit of space, we can fit a bike lane in here". Instead of thinking where do people actually want to go.
You can have hundreds of kilometers of biking infrastructure but if it is not connected or in places where it matters, people will still not cycle there.
If you built a highway for 1km and then before getting to another kilometer of the highway there would be a tractor track with a "drivers, get out and push your cars" sign, people would not use cars, I guess.
What a dream city. Crazy that this frozen tundra city doubled down on cycling and won. It's like more temperate cities have no excuse to not have more bike only roads.
Thanks for the video! One important factor not mention in the video is the stealing of bicycles. I grew up in Ferrara, Italy (nicknamed "the city of the bicycles), and now live in Gothenburg , Sweden, and in both places this is a huge problem with no apparent solution. Ferrara in Italy is worthy to check since the bicycle culture is really imbedded in the inhabitants of that city. Gothenburg is a city where, (for most parts) is easy to go around with your bike……..
I got nothing against building bike paths, I think they're great and they should tax the cyclists so that they are maintained once built. They can do so by putting tolls or having them register their bikes with the DMV and have them inspected once a year or so just like cars. I think that doing these things would help cyclist get and maintain their bike lanes without too much protest!!!
Did not mention hills my city is steep.
1:35 I don’t think many “trade routes” are maintained by cars. They are mostly an inefficient measure to transport one or a few people from A to B
I'm not against cycling but you will NEVER catch me riding a bike in those temperatures. Simply never.
I would love to bike to work instead of taking the train/driving, but living in NYC biking from Brooklyn to Manhattan is like a suicide run. We definitely need to create a standalone bike lane that doesn't share the road with cars because even with dedicated bike lanes in NY, people are constantly getting hit/injured/killed.
I'm a cyclist who lives in Los Angeles and have had no trouble riding in the street with traffic. It takes practice, you must have lights at night and you have to be a little aggressive at times but I now find it actually really fun. I don't think traffic lanes should be removed and have bike lanes put in that will be hardly used and make traffic worse.
In some US cities American conservatives will run cyclists off the street in order to kill or injure them. Because they aren't supporting automobile culture. It's not about land use or urban planning or any of that.
Quite the success… and soo many cyclists. Yet one fears not congestion!
If EU wants to increase bicycle riding, they need to implement the same speed limit for e-bikes you can find in the US. 20 mph. They also need to allow bikes being able to be ridden with throttle only. That's going to make e-bike demand shoot through the roof.
But but but you can't cycle in cold, snow, or rain!! Or… so I've been told by people who drive cars and have never tried.
For the algorithm
Oulu is not arctic. The arctic circle is 66.6N, and Oulu is situated 65N.
Next time you upload a video, get your fucking facts right before you pollute the minds of impressionable cattle with misinformation. If you need to fire people, fire them. Hell, if you need to fucking immolate any idiots just go ahead and do it. But don't you fucking DARE get """facts""" wrong. Lies and misinformation are the weapons of demons.
pedestrians should always have priority.
btw I'm a cyclist.
It was a pleasure to hear about infantstructure providers receiving feedback from users about how their works are perceived.
Wish we had that everywhere!
My take on the whole deal is really more based on my adventurous spirt, vast distances between areas in my country, and the lack of safe infrastructure. Giving up using a car permanently would require a catch. Everything that makes me happy and healthy has to be within new boundaries. I'd have to live extremely close to work, I would have to get my family to move closer as were spread out about 200 miles apart. 200 miles on a bike takes a full day at max speed for a season Tour De France contestant. Next in line is climate/activates. I like to swim a lot, I'm also considering the pandemic as a wake up call. I can't depend on public facilities like gyms and public pools to be open for a consistent routine. So I would need a place with a year round swimmable(can get cold just not freeze over) body of water, also it would be nice to hit the slopes during the winter. There are VERY FEW cities that would have all I would want or need without ever owning a car. A shortlist covering cities like Vancouver, Seattle. in such lack constant ice on pathways, have LIQUID water bodies year round and also have the option of nearby ski hills served by regular and reliable buss and train routes. But those places are incredibly expensive, even my current job that pulls 100-150k a year doesn't even come close to a sustainable lifestyle in these incredibly expensive cities. I'm not working my ass off so that once day I can get a puny pension and a political dildo when I grow old, I work to build up a buffer of investments and savings so I have what I need. Which my 2050(roughly my retirement age) would see my BASIC living expensive nearing $10,000 a month. I would be willing to give up the ski hills through if I had to choose. So that allows smaller and cheaper places like Prince Rupert(been there and yea I could learn to tolerate it's constant cloud just so I can bike and swim(using wetsuit in winter) year round. I would be okay with just about any tropical island, coast, etc. As I can add rowing as a new activity and also serves as and adventure. But climate wise my current hometown is a dry place with extreme(-45C) cold winters and boiling hot(+40C) summers, slim pickings for ski hills and every lake and river freezes solid for 6 months. There is a vast Bike trail network but unlike the place in this video they don't regularly maintain it to a safe standard. If I'm lucky(once every 3 or 4 years) I can cycle from March to November, But most years I can only get out between May and October. Summer VS Winter bike use is like night and day here
I've been 100% riding my bike for transportation in a snowy Northeast US city for the last 5 years. I need to use studded tires to ride directly on snow. I wonder how these guys do it. If I don't have those tires I can't stay upright, but with those tires I can ride through every bit of snow that this 100 inch/year city gets.
As a full time vehicular cyclist I don't like when they try to completely separate cycling traffic. I need access to the road to get where I'm going. There's a road here where they put a two way bike path next to the road and I have to cross the road to get to it, then when it ends I have to cross the road again. It's inefficient, and ironically, more dangerous.
As for CO2 plant more trees!! I can get somewhere faster in a car then a bike. Plus people on bikes think the are high and mightier than people in cars. I had to make a right hand turn and a bicyclist was in my blind spot. And almost ruined my car because he isn't sharing the road with me. I had my turn signal on but I bet he thought I can pass the 'witch" but I was about a half a foot to his bike.
And that isn't true "if you build it they will come" I have seen plenty of bike lane not one is being used by bicyclist. So, what is next? @JillWarren force people to ride bikes ban any and all car traffic? Sheesh 🙄🙄