A cyclist refused to reverse to make way for a 60ft lorry after the two came face-to-face on a country lane in Hampshire.

The driver, who wished to remain anonymous, filmed the footage. It shows the female lorry driver asking the cyclist to reverse and “go back to the wide bit”, as it would be easier than reversing a 60ft-long lorry.

The cyclist refuses and insists that lorries should not be using country lanes.

#cyclist #uk #hgv

Subscribe to The Telegraph with our special offer: just £1 for 3 months. Start your free trial now:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/customer/subscribe/digitalsub/3for1/?WT.mc_id=tmgoff_pvid_conversion-subscription_editorial-iniative_03-22_EGW-13_organic_youtube

Get the latest headlines: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/

Telegraph.co.uk and YouTube.com/TelegraphTV are websites of The Telegraph, the UK’s best-selling quality daily newspaper providing news and analysis on UK and world events, business, sport, lifestyle and culture.

So where am I meant to go to a wide bit there’s a I can see a wide bit just three low see a wide bit there you think it’s easier for me to reverse I’m 60 foot long in the same width of this road

As you can see by the fact I’m in the Hedge both sides turn and go back well because surely it’s easier for you to go back as a push bike than it is for me as a 60 foot lry so where am I meant to go

Do a wide bit there’s a I can see a wide bit just three low wide bit there you think it’s easier for me to reverse I’m 60t long and the same width of this road as you can see by the fact I’m in the Hedge both sides turn go well because

Surely it’s easier for you to go back as a push bike than it is for me as a 60ft lry so where am I meant to go to a wide bit there’s a I can see a wide bit just three low wide bit there you think it’s

Easier for me to reverse I’m 60 foot long in the same width of this road as you can see by the fact I’m in the Hedge both sides turn go back well because surely it’s easier for you to go back back as a push bike than it is for me as a 60t

Lry

50 Comments

  1. That’ll be a retired Karen decked-out in her Rohan all-weathers gear enjoying her copper-bottomed public sector pension expecting a 60-foot truck to reverse whilst she could just step aside for 10 seconds….Is there a female equivalent of the anglo-saxon epithet “w****r” ? She surely is one, n’est ce pas ?

  2. It’s lucky the lane was so narrow meaning the lorry needed to go very slow or there may. It have been an opportunity to speak! I do appreciate the cyclist’s annoyance but surely her common sense should have to,d her what to do. Would have been interesting to see footage of how these. Two came face to face, because surely the cyclist would be seen to keep moving towards the lorry, unless she was ‘Mr Ben’ and just appeared out of no where.

  3. Cyclists own the roads now… All vehicles have to give them full priority at all times and road markings are optional. Question is, why dont vehicles have priority in cycle lanes. Strange world.

  4. Lady driver, lady cyclist… yet conflict. Sad, but reflects the UK today. Large vehicles do have to visit farms – it would not be there without a commercial/service need to be there. The cyclist is out for leisure and cyclists pay no road tax (lorries pay a fair whack). Motorists have always given cyclists respect regarding their safety and the law has certainly accentuated this now, perhaps giving some of them a sense of absolute entitlement. But I reckon this lady cyclist should also respect and help someone just doing their job. I think the lady could very easily turn the bike round and walk (or even cycle) back to a wider bit of the lane as she is being politely asked to do. I am sure most motorists in cars (and indeed most cyclists) would do this to help a working lorrydriver – often the best & most helpful of road users – then they could have a happy chat and a good feeling they have helped someone doing their job. As a retired person I have the greatest regard for those working for their living whatever they do. I might suspect this lady cyclist is someone who just likes to get her own way and would not give any thought to this particular argument. Sad really that she feels better for being stubborn than being helpful to a still-working person – especially this courteous lady driver.

  5. I read somewhere that, in the sky, considerations about right-of-way are based partly on practicality. It is far easier for an aeroplane to move out of the way than for a hot air balloon. So, when the two meet each other, normally the hot air balloon would have priority; it's just common sense.

    The same applies here; it's far easier for the cyclist to move. And the cyclist has no business arguing with the lorry driver about whether the latter had a right to be there. As other comments have highlighted, large vehicles are necessary in the countryside; modern agriculture could not survive without them. The lorry driver presumably had no choice; there were no wider roads around.

  6. If the HGV wont fit in the passing points then it shouldnt be down those sorts of lanes. This is bullying behaviour from driver and company alike. I say that as someone who has worked around HGVs for a large part of my working life.

  7. Cyclist giving cyclists a bad name. This is one of those “ all motorists are the enemy “ people who will pick an argument and then go and tell the world they were a victim of road rage.

  8. I'm willing to bet, she has a problem with the farmer farming his land and she saw the lorry go past her window knowing when it will be coming back and headed out on her bike just for this argument!

  9. That HGV is far too wide for that narrow country c category lane, which even has grass growing up the middle! This would have been obvious on a map but maybe her satnav wasn't accurate enough for HGV drivers? However, the only resolution is for the cyclist to get out of the way.

  10. Cyclists are a menace.They now ride side ny side and the laws on their side
    On narrow roads and roads with traffic makes it near impossible to overtake.
    It js no wonder there are sometimes arguments.

Leave A Reply