The first think you need to know about crypto is, “what is money?”
The second is, “what is property?” and that is our topic for today.
Joining us is notorious economist Hernando De Soto who is here to give us a masterclass on the world of property right and why we need to tokenize the world.
——
✨ DEBRIEF | Ryan & David unpacking the episode:
https://www.bankless.com/debrief-hernando
—–
🏹 Airdrop Hunter is HERE, join your first HUNT today
https://bankless.cc/JoinYourFirstHUNT
——
BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS:
🐙KRAKEN | MOST-TRUSTED CRYPTO EXCHANGE
https://k.xyz/bankless-pod-q2
🦊METAMASK PORTFOLIO | MANAGE YOUR WEB3 EVERYTHING
https://bankless.cc/MetaMask
⚖️ARBITRUM | SCALING ETHEREUM
https://bankless.cc/Arbitrum
🔗CELO | CEL2 COMING SOON
https://bankless.cc/Celo
👾GMX | V2 IS NOW LIVE
https://bankless.cc/GMX
💲 USDV | NATIVE OMNICHAIN STABLECOIN
https://bankless.cc/usdv
——
TIMESTAMPS
00:00:00 Intro
00:06:38 Welcome Hernando
00:08:34 History of Property Rights
00:12:31 Property Rights in The US
00:20:27 Value of Property Right Management Systems
00:27:34 The Role of Buerocracy
00:33:09 Advantage of Strong Property Rights
00:40:58 Other Countries Property Rights Systems
00:48:10 Comparing Property Rights Systems
01:00:20 Capitalism
01:07:32 Blockchains and Crypto
01:18:13 Summarizing Blockchain
01:23:54 Dealing With Politics
01:32:30 Closing Thoughts
——
RESOURCES
Hernando:
Tweets by HDeSotoPeru
——
Not financial or tax advice. See our investment disclosures here:
https://www.bankless.com/disclosures
You already help title the world. What you’re going to do is tokenize it. You’re going to take that title, which is not negotiable internationally, and make it negotiable global because what we’ve got underneath our earth is only valuable in the measure in which it reaches industrialized
Countries. Very simple. So what you want to do is not say that you’re going to title because then people will get scared and say, but what do I know about titling? It’s already titled. What you’ve got to do is tokenize. Welcome to Bankless, where we explore the frontier of internet money and
Internet finance. This is Ryan Sean Adams. I’m here with David Hoffman, and we’re here to help you become more bankless. The first thing you need to understand about crypto is what is money? The second thing you need to understand about crypto is what is property? That is the topic
Today. We have an episode with Hernando de Soto. He’s an economist who helped the world, the entire world understand the incredible wealth creation power of property rights. And now he wants to recruit crypto to help tokenize the world. Those are his words, a few takeaways today, not ours in
This one. A few things we talk about today. Number one, what are property rights? How do they unlock wealth? Why do countries with strong property rights systems seem to win while countries without them falter? Number two, what is capitalism? How is it related to property rights? Number three,
What does property rights have to do with crypto? Maybe everything, maybe nothing? No. Number three, what does property rights have to do with this crypto thing we’re doing? Number four, why Hernando thinks there’s a new global race between China and the US to title the world
And how crypto might play a part. And number five, Hernando gives his advice for the crypto industry and issues a call. Help tokenize the world. David, this was an incredible episode. Why was it significant to you? Every once in a while on the Bankless program, we come into
These episodes that are a huge synthesis of a lot of knowledge that we’ve explored with different episodes. We did the what is money episode with Lynn Alden, right? We’ve done identity episodes with the Ethereum attestation service. This episode is one of those ones like this is something we’ve
Been training for. This is a synthesis of money and settlement assurances and identity and ledgers and governance. All of these ideas come together to form this property rights system. You don’t have property rights without many different component technologies that I think we’ve explored
Each individual component on Bankless previously pretty thoroughly. But now this is an episode where we’re really putting it all together to really show the power that is the system of property rights management and illustrates why crypto as an alternative property rights management,
A new property rights management that is more global, more efficient, more accepting, more permissionless is the next step forward for humanity. There are some things that you should know about when we get into this episode with Hernando. Hernando uses you and us a lot in this
Episode. You is referring to the United States as a whole. You guys, when he says you guys, he’s talking about the United States historically or current us is referring to Peru where Hernando is from or maybe more broadly, Southern American countries. He also uses the word subsurface.
He’s referring to precious metals, industrial metals, mining operations, natural resources that are located below ground and mainly in Peru and Latin American countries because that is a source of a lot of Latin American wealth and property. So just wanted to add that illustration
Before we get into the episode with Hernando. All right, guys, let’s get right to the episode with Hernando de Soto, legendary economist. But before we do, we want to thank the sponsors who made this possible, including our number one recommended exchange in a place where I acquire
My digital property. Yeah, that’s Kraken. Go check him out. Kraken knows crypto. Kraken’s been in the crypto game for over a decade and as one of the largest and most trusted exchanges in the industry,
Kraken is on the journey with all of us to see what crypto can be. Human history is a story of progress. It’s part of us hardwired. We’re designed to seek change everywhere, to improve, to strive. And if anything can be improved, why not finance? Crypto is a financial system designed with the
Modern world in mind. Instant, permissionless and 24 seven. It’s not perfect and nothing ever will be perfect. But crypto is a world changing technology at a time when the world needs it the most. That’s the Kraken mission to accelerate the global adoption of cryptocurrency so that you
And the rest of the world can achieve financial freedom and inclusion. Head on over to kraken.com slash bankless to see what crypto can be. Not investment advice. Crypto trading involves risk of loss. Cryptocurrency services are provided to U.S. and U.S. territory customers by Payward Ventures
EEC, PVI doing business as Kraken. Introducing GMX, the deepest on-chain futures market to trade Bitcoin, Ethereum and leading altcoins. GMX is a permissionless decentralized exchange that offers perpetual futures and spot trading. Lightning fast trade execution and competitive pricing with the
Security and self custody of a decentralized exchange. GMX is live now with V2 bringing new optimizations to on-chain leverage trading. And even more than an improved trading experience, GMX will reward you for just participating. All GMX users can easily set up a referral link. And
With $12 million of Arbitrum grants being distributed as incentives and over $150 billion in trading volume to date all settled on-chain, GMX is leading the charge in terms of opportunities for DeFi liquidity providers. The future is on-chain with your wallets, with your trades
And with your money in your own hands. Try it out now at app.gmx.io. Introducing USDV, a better type of stablecoin. Currently billions of dollars in stablecoin yield each year are paid to Tether, Circle and other central issuers of major stablecoins. But what if yield could be shared
With the protocols that use it? Those protocols in turn can decide how to reward their users. USDV shares its yield with a community of apps and developers that mint it. Every USDV is backed one-to-one by US treasury bills which pay yield. This yield flows out to the community of USDV
Issuers. So your protocol or app can get paid for helping end users convert other stables into USDV. This works thanks to a breakthrough technology called color trace from layer zero. Without it, it was impossible to attribute users of a token with a specific issuer. But now we can. USDV is
Live on Ethereum, Optimism, Arbitrum and other chains and it’s already available on over 20 exchanges such as Curve, BitGet, Velodrome and Stargate. Start participating in the yield from treasury backed stablecoins at bankless.com slash USDV. Bankless Nation, I am extremely pleased and
Honored to present you with Hernando de Soto. He’s a prominent Peruvian economist known for his massive contributions to the understanding of this thing we’ll be talking about a little bit today called property rights. He wrote a book called The Mystery of Capital, Why Capitalism
Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. And this book presents some of the best arguments I’ve ever read on why property rights are the key to economic prosperity of developed countries such as many in the West and also are the major barrier to economic growth in developing nations.
Hernando, welcome to Bankless. Thank you very much for having me. Well, Hernando, we brought you on to Bankless to help us understand property rights from first principles. And just to set this up, there’s really two reasons we want to explore this on a
Technology and crypto podcast. And I think the first reason is this, not enough people understand or appreciate property rights. So property rights are like a coordination technology that I think many people, particularly in the West, they really take for granted.
And they also explain, I think this is the core to your argument, they explain a massive portion of our economic progress. So that’s the first reason. But the second reason is this, property rights are actually the entire point of crypto. David and I have argued this before, we’ve had
Folks like Mark Andreessen, Chris Dixon talk about this. In fact, Mark Andreessen was the one that originally pointed us to your book, Hernando. But if you think about crypto, Bitcoin is really a property rights system registry for money. That money is called Bitcoin. What is Ethereum? Ethereum
Is a property rights registry for money as well. It’s a ledger for that. And also any other type of digital property. And that’s why crypto is valuable in the first place, this internet native bottom up permissionless property rights system. So I think to frame this out, crypto listener,
If you want to understand the potential of crypto, you have to understand property rights first. That’s where we’re going to start today’s conversation. Hernando, maybe we could start with our forgotten history. Can you tell us how property rights came to be in the West,
How they came to be in maybe even the US? Where this all started? Who knows? Metropozamia, where the US Civil War, the conquest, etc. What we do know, aside from history, is what we see in places in the world, which are somewhere in terms of economic development, technology,
Before the times even of Jesus Christ, that exists in the world. You see it in certain tribes in Latin America, you see it in Asia, you see it in Africa. And there isn’t one place that you can go
To, no matter how primitive it is, or one conquistador, right, or one invader like Genghis Khan, or whatever, that doesn’t talk about or just shows to you that he has a right or she has a right to
Be there, and the people that surround him, because it’s in a record of some sort. If that exists, given the fact that I’ve traveled 150 countries probably with my colleagues to see this, I have yet to be told. When everybody, what they do, and that’s the way cultures begin to become
Civilizations, is you got to know who is where. You’ve got to know who has the rights to what, whether they’re community rights or whether they’re individual rights. As a matter of fact, the interesting thing is when you talk to somebody and say, Mr. Townsend, why Townsend?
Because he lives at the town’s end. This so-called means, for example, in Spanish, it’s a bush. It means the guy that was close to the bushes. So obviously, location is a very important thing. And all civilizations begin by eventually creating records that say, pick up the fundamental
Information that is necessary for location and identity. And when people do that, they end up creating a civilization because the information you want to put in a property title is the one that does allow you to govern in a civilized manner. So in the United States, when you had
Gotten your independence and you needed to take over territory, take Spaniards out, take Mexicans out, take Frenchmen out, take anybody else out, what you did is you imported Europeans. And you told these Europeans, we have counted them 32 preemption acts. For example,
The Little Miami River Preemption Act, the Corn Bill Preemption Act, which was how much corn were you able to plant to improve the land, or Log Cabin Act, which was about how many pieces or how many logs you have put together to build a cabin, that gave you a right to territory.
You had 32 of these things, 32 preemption acts, the last one of them being the Homestead Act, but it was the last. By the time you had the Homestead Act, you had the Gold Rush, you already
Had taken over Texas, you knew who owns what in Santa Fe. It’s the first thing you did, and it’s the first thing the Spaniards did in Latin America, and it’s the first thing that Genghis Khan did when he swept through Asia. Wow. Okay, so property rights is not underpinning for,
I guess, civilization and economic prosperity. I’m wondering if we could get into actually the story of how the US developed its property rights system, because in your book and from, you know, everything you’ve talked about, Hernando, I get the feeling it wasn’t overnight. It wasn’t just
Somebody kind of snapped their fingers. George Washington said, you know, and on the fifth day, let there be property rights, and there was property rights. The picture you paint in your book is much more of an evolutionary process, a series of, you know, bills, maybe a series of
Laws ultimately get enshrined in a legal system. Can you talk about the messy process of setting up a property rights system in a country like the US? Well, you’re right to say that it was messy,
But it was messy everywhere you go, and you don’t have settlers. From what little I know about the United States, never having lived in the United States, but seeing it from the documents that interested me to test theories, presumptions, or do away with myths, was that you had populations
That were in their majority hunters and gatherers. That’s what your indigenous people were. And then at the beginning, some white folks that came from Europe bought rights to these, but using the common law, which is everybody had there was a respected judge. Captain Smith managed
To make a good relationship with Pocahontas. You gathered a social contract, and you decided that areas that they moved beyond, you would give them money, and you would give them title to it. Then the French were interested in sovereignty, which is, I don’t care who owns what,
This belongs to France, the nation state. All right? And so what they did is they said, what we’re going to do is give the Indian or the original native population the right, since they’re not aware of a property right because they moved around, the right to govern, the vertical principle
Of sovereignty. You know, you too can become a nation state. So the Mohicans could become a nation state. The Iroquois could become a nation state. That allowed them to organize an army. That allowed them to start driving the Brits out. Then the Brits had to make a decision of how they
Were going to counter these enormous armies that the French had that were full of Mohicans and other people coming in to edge them out of the northeast of North America. And so the Brits decided that they too, they’re Indians, were going to have rights. And they declared no,
From what I understand, the common law titles that judges had awarded George Washington and Benjamin Franklin and Jefferson for their land and said America belongs to its indigenous people. So the whites didn’t like it. And so they went out to recuperate their land and also went around
Telling the Indians, your Indians, that they were nations as well. And there was no more of these property rights. What they were going to have from now on were going to be sovereign nations. So they, from my point of view, say in terms of left versus right, they converted your tribes
Into communists while they, the whites, remained capitalists in the sense of private property. Afterwards, everybody was sorry about that, of course, so you decided to take it away from them. Now, so the way it always starts is the messy sort of stuff. And then gradually, as you decide to go
From shining sea to shining sea, through manifest destiny, you imported even more Europeans and moved westward all the way up until California with the gold rush. And it was rough going. I mean, there’s a lot of spaghetti western showing how everybody shot each other. But eventually,
You settle down the way I read about it or what I’ve seen from people who look at record keeping. You eventually registered different claims for which, by the way, since you had no expertise in recording property, like the Mediterranean, you imported Chileans and Peruvians to do that sort
Of a job. And by the time you got to the 19th century, you already became a titled nation. And you had different types of titles. And as opposed to other countries, because it seems that Americans don’t like the idea of central authority, you sort of brought the whole thing together
With some kind of spontaneous consultation. But you do have a system that diverges from city to city, from state to state, from area to area, which is why you have an industry that thrives in the United States, which we don’t in the rest of the world, called title insurance.
And title insurance, you could say, my God, why don’t we get rid of it? Well, because title insurance, you know, like Americans, you always find a way to get another drip out of the orange juice. And it gives you the right not only to buy and sell something, but if there’s
Been a mistake, you got insurance. So the result, anyhow, one way or another, as opposed to the French and say the Germans who have central registries, like the rest of the world, most of the surface of the world is today titled. And everybody is mostly in records. The problem is
That there is no central records for developing countries, what people now call the global south, right, especially for the poor part of their population. But let me tell you, there is one tribe that you go to, there isn’t one settlement that you visit from Mozambique to South Africa,
To the Maghreb, Egypt, that doesn’t have some kind of a record. And therefore, one of the things we try and do is find what do they all have in common so that one day we have a sort of a mankind record
And we can avoid wars. Because if you think about wars, and we’re seeing that they’re surging everywhere in the world now, or at least in different continents, it’s always about territory. And part of territory has to do with sovereignty. I’m a Ukrainian, for example, and part of territory
Has to do with I own it personally. And that’s what we call property. I think bankless listeners can really start to pierce through a lot of these stories and get some of the contours, Hernando, that we talk about a lot on bankless, which is the evolution of asset ownership, the evolution
Of identity, the evolution of sovereignty, as it relates to human organization. The crypto industry is illustrated as we’re speed running the history of money and finance. But I think sometime in 2020, we learned that we’re also speed running the history of human coordination. And a lot of it
Has to do with the process of learning how to organize who owns what, starting with land. When you say the word that the land across the world is titled, I hear that we are creating organizational systems that is decreeing, accounting for property, property rights, starting with land and then also
Other things as well. And when you started, when you first started this episode, we talked about, you talked about how we don’t really know where property rights started. You can see it start in Africa. You can see it start in Asia. You can see it start differently, separately, independently
In Europe. And this is also a similar story, Hernando, that we talk about on bankless about where money comes from. It actually just starts in pockets all over the world a little bit more emergently. And then it comes together as technology does over time as cultures come together.
I think one of my favorite stories about where money comes from is the first time there was ever writing. Writing was invented. It was as a ledger determining who in a tribe owned what assets, owned what money. And so this ledger, which is this bureaucratic tool, was one of the first tools
That we used to create writing, which was the accounting of who owned money. And I think land was the next one right after that. But I want to talk about, I want to ask you about the motivation for the development of this technology that is ledger systems or property right management systems.
What’s so valuable about a property rights management system? What’s so valuable about like a title? Why do humans seek these things? What does it unlock for humans? Why is it good for us? Well, it’s about the identity. It’s about information. What’s the only thing that
Doesn’t move around you is land. It’s a demarcation point. It starts somewhere. It begins somewhere. I mean, right now I asked my colleague Gustavo because I had it lying around and I hadn’t thought about it before. But here is, for example, my hometown, Arequipa. We’re back now in about 1860.
And here is the currency we use. Now Arequipa is a small town here in Peru. And this is issued by the Bank of Arequipa, which 40 years before belonged to Spain, but it issued its own money and it was private. I mean, central banking came afterwards. So obviously, you know, when we invented,
You know, paper money or we minted money, that allowed you to capture a certain amount of value. What was the first thing that Alexander the Great did when he invaded some place and took over, he would take whatever metal was used to value transactions. He would melt it and then mint it
With his name and stuff. So obviously, writing it up, minting it represented forms of value. Somewhere, sometimes they refer to very concrete things like my home, my house, my land, an animal. And that was it. But let me tell you, when we went to, for example, Tanzania,
Brought in by the president just about some 20, 30 years ago, and we set up the system, which, by the way, won a prize at the United Nations three times successfully for being the best organizational system that at those times the United Nations had produced.
To show that there was nothing wrong in doing this, we went out and filmed everything we could. That included cattle. And we asked them to show us one cow in the whole country, where it was full of about 16,000 communities, tribal communities, and there wasn’t one that didn’t brand its animals.
So even animals held the titles on their backsides. So obviously, we have, even at the most, shall we say, primitive or initial levels of gathering, people put labels on things. And that explains signs and explains the symbols. And then, obviously, over time,
We started learning to put some kind of a value over them. But the reason I’m telling you these things, and I think it’s important that you draw on them, is that if you start talking about history, we’re talking about things that happened 2,000, 4,000 years ago. And so then you start talking
To historians, and you get a bloody nose, because some guys say it’s always communal, somebody says it was always individual. There’s plenty of incipient civilizations in the world, enough of them, to go out and simply ask them what they’re doing. And they all have symbols that
Refer to identity and for different purposes. In other words, it’s not always about identity, about I am so-and-so. And second step, I own that. But it’s also about permissions. I mean, when you take an ATM, when you go to an ATM and you put in a card, it’s an identity card, right?
But what does that identity card do? Why should I need it? I’ve got a driver’s license in the United States. I got a national identity in Peru or probably most other places in the world. But essentially, your ATM card is an identity so that you could get a permit to do something.
So by recording things, you get ownership. By recording things, you transfer value. And the third thing that I was just talking about, you get the permit to withdraw money, or you get the permit to enter a house. So everything that moves values one way or another
Always seems to come with a representation. Probably Bertrand Russell and Wittgenstein would have called that microfax, that the world is composed of microfax, which Bertrand Russell calls little splashes of color. And then eventually somebody comes and brings the
Whole together and forms a big image of everything. But all things are made of little pieces of information. And I would say that’s essentially what crypto does or what little I know about it or what identity or property does. It’s in formation. And in terms of economics,
The advantage of that information is that it tells the banker, tells whoever is going to loan. It tells anybody who’s going to get credit. Credit comes from, I believe in you, that you are you and you’ve got something to lose. But if you are you and you got nothing to lose,
Then how am I going to get paid back? Or why should you be marrying my daughter? Hernando, you talked about a different number of mechanisms, all around symbols, like an old king would melt down metal and then stamp it with his symbol of authenticity. Or some company would have
A brand and their brand cattle with their symbol of ownership or like a land title is has some sort of stamp on it or symbol of legitimacy coming from it by some issuer of sorts. To me, a lot of this
Has like valence with bureaucracy or just like, you know, a management system. And sovereignty, of course, is also like a nation state topic as well as like a nation state has legitimacy. And you’ve also invoked this idea of common law. These are all like bureaucratic or legal systems
To process information as you say it. Can you talk about this process? Why is this process of what I call bureaucracy, what we might call legal systems? Why is this component of property rights important? What does it do? Well, because all of these symbols, as I mentioned before,
Are spread out. And going back to Bertrand Russell, the famous British philosopher, and he’s talked about little splashes of color. What builds up to being something trustworthy is not just one single quantity of information. You got to bring a whole bunch of things together.
So, for example, when we’ve titled Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, first thing you want us to say is what’s the local arrangement because enforcement will take place locally. And you will find out that they trade locally using a certain type of documentation.
And then once that’s done, you want to know if they don’t pay up, for example, what’s government going to do about it. And so then you want to know if government has actually recognized that. And nearly all governments have done that when they conquered. When Peru was conquered, for
Example, we found that out by going into churches since the first thing the Spaniards want to do is avoid disorder among a population, a huge population that they had conquered. They set up records in churches. That was the ideal place where you recorded deaths and you record all sorts of things.
And nobody wrote about it, but we started picking up these old papers. And we had to decide what we were going to do with that kind of knowledge. But it was interesting because the first group of documents put together by a string that was about 500 years old said Don Diego Kaki,
A pure indigenous Peruvian, part of, shall we say, the Inca civilization, hereby dies and leaves behind for his children 90 mule trains, wine distillery in the port of Callao. This is 30 years after Francisco Pizarro and Hernando de Soto, supposedly my ancestor of land. And then
They say and owns three galleons that do trade with Panama, where you cross the Islas of Panama and then you go all the way to Europe. In other words, the Incas took only 30 years to adapt to the Western recording system. Before that, they had their own recording system,
Which is called the Kipu, which is a system of knots on strings, which some Peruvians say, of course, is the origin of a blockchain, because we like, they use a string. So what I’m trying to tell you with that is if you really want to find out where Diego Kaki got
His stuff today or his family, and you really want to get the root of title all the way down, you will need all of these different symbols. And then therefore, when you award property, it’s the result of various affidavits, testimonies, comparisons of information,
Track records, debt records. In other words, if you go through all the stages that are necessary for a right to mine gold in Peru before it reaches Wall Street so that an American company can use that to create an international public offering, you’ll need a whole bunch of documents. One is
Not only enough, you need to crisscross things. A whole series of assurances, a whole series of what we call, what we use, the best word we found is assertions, assertions of one sort of another, and somebody ends up putting a seal on them and guaranteeing this. It’s not just one person
Saying, you know, David owns this, and you can trust me, right, because I was in the Marines or I went to Harvard. Not enough. You got to crisscross all sorts of information. And it gets more complicated when you go internationally. The countries who end up dominating the symbol,
Which is what, for example, President, French President de Gaulle didn’t like about the United States and post-Second World War, is that he said, these Americans, if you now use the dollar as a point of reference for everything, the gold exchange standard, they know how to take advantage of
Everything because they’ve captured the symbol of value, the number one symbol of value. And what the Chinese are trying to take away from you now, the Global South, is the right to a monopoly to that symbol so that it isn’t just the dollar, because you can manipulate the dollar one way
Or another. Like you can manipulate gold, too. I mean, whatever you use, you’re helping somebody out. If you use gold, you help us Peruvians out, but you also help the Boers in South Africa, and you also help Putin, which are major producers of gold. So coming to an agreement on what is
Valid or not is not only a question of knowing who owns what where, but also what are the political interests behind it. So it’s a complex business. It’s just such a fascinating discussion, Hernando. And I think listeners are beginning to get a picture of property rights, what they’re
Useful for and how they’re secured. And really, if I were to distill what I’ve heard so far, property rights are kind of secured and settled by a legal framework that recognizes and enforces all of the rights. And oftentimes, those rights are settled in court systems. And they’re enforced,
Or maybe using your word, which I really like, asserted by government, by the power of governments, and they’re recorded using symbols in these ledgers that are often maintained by bureaucracies. That’s kind of the mystery of what a property rights system actually is. And I want to hone in
And circle on what it unlocks, because this was a key insight that I took away from your book that I didn’t have previously in all your talks and thinking around this, is the difference between a country that has unlocked its capital using property rights and emerging country that doesn’t
Have a good property rights system. So I think you call a lot of developing countries that don’t have property rights system. They have maybe these informal economies that sort of aren’t written down, aren’t settled in court systems, don’t have all of the benefits of a strong property rights
System. And you call a lot of the capital in those economies, dead capital. And to me, that implies they haven’t quite been unlocked. And I think that is part of the value proposition of property rights, right? So many listeners will maybe have a title on a piece of property or piece of land,
Maybe a mortgage. And one of the things they can do once they have that title is they can actually take out a loan against that mortgage, against that capital. And so they’re able to unlock this asset in an entirely new way. I’m wondering if you could talk about the advantages
That economies have and countries have when they have a mature, strong property rights system versus maybe some developing countries that don’t have that and this ability to unlock capital. What does that exactly mean? So also to make this colorful and maybe somewhat
Extravagant to tell you that one wonders if property is not the source of money, not the other way around. So the way I understand it is that 5% of the money of the United States is issued by the Fed. 95% is not issued by the Fed. It’s issued by banks against documentation.
And you’ve got a whole process. Remember, I’ve never lived in the United States. You’ve got a whole process that has to do to avoid fraud. I mean, your acts of 1933 and 1934, your securities acts that have been imitated all over the world and have, of course,
Been improved over time are essentially called anti-fraud acts. And the reason they’re anti-fraud acts is because people put together information according to procedures accepted by the banking or the capital formation community. And then eventually when they’re all put together in the
Right kind of file, they go to the window of a bank and say, this is it. And if the bank says, I’ve got here my list of to-dos and don’ts, and yes, this is value, they put it in their ledger
Or in their accountancy books as capital, that is to say as an asset. That allows you to go to another second window of the bank and in due time say, I’ve got an asset there, issue the money I
Need to be able to pay this or buy that. So what forms money is the fact that somebody has, whether you know it or not, determined that the papers that you’ve put together are value. And it’s not your central government, five, they set the rules. Basically what the money you get or
Whatever form it takes, and it might never come out in the form of cash, it just comes in the form of the you have a right to do this or you have a right to do that, is the result of paper systems
And symbols which allow you to use a symbol for value which is called the dollar, right, or the French franc or a currency or whatever it is. That’s one example. The other example would be,
And I’m trying, I may be going over the edge, but this is the way I see it, south from darkest Peru is the following thing. The Chinese are coming now to Latin America and Africa and edging you out, especially regarding mining and energy resources. They’re really pushing you out.
But why are they doing it? It is because they have found a way of recording their own values and recording that of ours in Latin America, shall we say, and in Africa in such a way that against them they’re buying up the subsurface of the earth.
So whether one realizes it or not, the Chinese issue that you’ve got of rivalry with them all over the world is kind of blockchain-ish. They haven’t come in with weapons. There are no military bases of China. What they’ve come in is with the kind of paper
That allows them to buy our subsurface where we, for example, between Chile and Peru, own 38% or export 38% of the copper you need to break the chokehold that Russia has over you because Europe or the West in its war in Ukraine depends essentially on fossil fuels that come
From Russia, oil, coal, gas. And if you want to move to clean energy, that isn’t going to go through tubes because it’s aeolic, that is to say wind, it’s hydraulic, it’s nuclear. And all those three energies that are clean travel through copper, and we got most of it.
And the Chinese have been able to create a system that symbolizes value that allows them now to own more copper in Peru, supposedly where your backyard of the United States, and they’re converting it into their front garden. So what I’m trying to tell you is that
The logic behind ownership and its relationship to money and the purchase of real things is a whole art that is now also very much in the books of different civilizations that are surging throughout the world, including the one that’s fast growing,
Which is China. And it’s not because of their military power, it’s because they’ve got more than one bag of tricks that meets the eye. It’s so fascinating to frame is sort of, you know, the China versus US political power dominance as a race to export their property
Rights system to the world, a race to export their symbols, I guess, and to become the dominant symbol across the world. And that’s really the story I think that many in the West have forgotten that underpins a lot of, you know, the success that countries like the United States have have.
They’ve been able to export this property rights system to much of the world, but now there’s a new contender on the scene. I want to talk about China and blockchain and that sort of thing relative
To the US in a minute. But first, one thing to unpack here as we’re talking about countries that don’t have a strong property rights system and developing countries, we might call them with all of this dead capital. Can I just ask a simple question, Hernando? What is stopping countries
From just putting a good property rights system in place? I mean, your book and a lot of your writings, you’ve talked about the value of this for a long time, and I’m sure many smart people in developing countries like know that the value is in property rights system. They’re looking at
Successful economies throughout history and they sort of see it. It’s your property rights, it’s, you know, capitalism from these ingredients. What’s stopping countries from just putting a property rights system in place? Well, the first thing is, I would suppose,
Uh, what Milton Friedman called the triangle of the status quo. Okay, if you’ve learned to do things one way, your way, it becomes part of your culture, you’re proud of it. You’re also do it even abstractly, you don’t have to think about it. And then somebody comes around, like, say,
With blockchain or whatever comes and says, look, this is different. People are resistance to change. Uh, and so you’ll see that, uh, the Europeans come around and decide that, okay, they’re gonna have just one common currency when all of a sudden, uh, they’re threatened by the yen or the yuan or
They’re threatened by the dollar. But it, it, it takes usually a dramatic moment to make a change in your life, give you an idea. Uh, because I found this out and I’m not academic, but I found
This out since I had to solve problems back home. When I started finding out, you know, the Germans have Roman law, like we do in Latin America, like most of the world, statutory law. Uh, when did they set up their groom book system, which is their centralized property system. And that was when
Napoleon in 1806 defeated them. I mean, he really rushed them off the map. And the reason for that was that during the, before the French revolution, all also with Louis the 14th, but during the French revolution and, uh, uh, Napoleonic times, they had done what the French
Called the registry of homes. And therefore all their, all their, uh, armies had titles to property and they believe strongly in the French Republic. While in the case of, uh, of Prussia, which was that part of Germany at the, at the time, uh, the farmers refused to go and join
The, uh, uh, the forces of precious leader because they hadn’t been awarded titles to land. And it’s a long time they were fed up with the feudal system, which allowed the feudal Lords to tax them. So once they were defeated by Napoleon, whose big, whose big political argument
To Europe as he moved towards, uh, Moscow was property rights. He just called them something different. The rights of the people or whatever, but it was property rights oblige Germans then to go out and title, uh, their own, uh, uh, the title of their own, uh, uh, people, uh, so that, uh,
They could beat back Napoleon’s army in the Congress of Vienna. Finally, you know, uh, get the French out of the way, uh, lock them up, uh, lock up Napoleon and the Island of Elba, all those things. So, um, what I’m saying, what I’m saying is take something dramatic to do that.
So for example, if, uh, if I was told, what is the issue of having, why don’t they have records of property in the areas of Israel and Palestine, et cetera? Uh, I’ve been saying that this is something they should settle. It identifies people, right? But I think that what will do it at
The end is that nobody knows where the rockets were coming out from Palestine. If you had a property rights system, you would know where they came from. So property rights become important issue. When you find out that it’s not just the fact that you’ve got a beautiful house or you’ve
Got nice trees in front of it and your kids are growing. But when you realize that without it, you are continually threatened, but the lack of identity really hits you. And then, you know, who, which Russians have the right to be in the Ukraine, which of them do not, uh,
Possibly they had a good property rights system. They could have sorted that out before without having to resort to finding out whether it’s Russia that runs the place or the Ukraine. I might be oversimplifying it, but property rights is essentially not so much the right.
It is the information and sovereign the pro and why is sovereignty not a substitute to that? Because sovereignty is, you might call it not really a right. It’s might. It comes from the top down while property right comes from a consensus at the bottom, which is that’s a right, the right
Thing to do versus the wrong thing to do. I really love this articulation of different property rights systems and their effectiveness for more or less doing their job. Like not all property rights systems are the same. Some do their jobs better than others. And I think maybe
One of the ways to articulate why the, uh, why the United States became the epicenter of capitalism is because our legal system and our courts system and the system of legitimacy was able to go down the long tail of assets in turning that into legal property that, like you said,
We can then take to the bank and access the capital that is inside of that property. And I think maybe if we compared that to other property rights systems in corrupt nations, accessing the long tail of property and accessing the capital in that property is not easy or perhaps
Even possible due to an inferior nature of that property rights system. And something I would also say about like the traditional nation state legal property rights systems, the ones that, you know, we have in the United States also exists in any European country, in any country whatsoever,
Is that it’s actually fragmented. Like our United States property rights systems is actually incompatible with Mexico’s just next door. And so there has to be some sort of cross system communication there of which there can be, but it’s still a boundary that must be traversed.
And so this is, I think, why we and Ryan are so interested in a digital property rights system because it’s not fragmented. It can access a global and become a global system, although there are obstacles in order to get there. But Hernandez, I want to ask about just like
The, there’s this word in traditional finance called securitization where if I have some sort of asset, I can go to a bank and say, hey, I have this asset. Can you help me turn it into,
I have this piece of property. I have this thing that I own. Can you help me turn it into a financial asset? And that’s the process of securitization, unlocking this asset that I have that exists in like the traditional world. And maybe we can vet the American property rights
System and say that it’s good because the system of property rights can securitize a lot of property in the world and turn it into assets. And that’s why the American financial system is so dominant. Where if I would go into a third world, a developing country with that same
Piece of property that I own, and I would take it to that financial system and ask them to turn it into an asset, a financial asset, they might not have the system in place in order to do that.
And so capital stays locked. Can you just talk about the technology and how some property rights systems are better than others at doing this job? Or do you just agree at all with this articulation of the efficacy of property rights systems and the capital that it unlocks?
Well, a question always comes into mind if the people that that run the system are the best people to change the system. First of all, because of the old habits. But what you want to do is identify who has an interest in changing the system.
I would not spend too much time finding out how you can do security. For example, in the case of my country, Peru, where we’re supposed to in Latin America actually be the the biggest center for natural products. I mean, we will be the biggest one in the
Course of the next 10, 20 years. You know, our metals, our minerals, our agriculture, because we’ve hardly developed that. So the question here is, to answer your question, what creates this? What creates this need for security is not necessarily you’re not
Necessarily going to find it in the financial sector itself. You may have to find outside. For example, you have a war with Japan, right? Starts in the 1930s Pearl Harbor and all of that. Then at that time, Japan has a gross national product per capita, that is to say, the individual
Wealth of each Japanese is one half of that of a Peruvian or a Brazilian, which is a reason why we have large parts of our population have a Japanese origin. That means they were poor and we were relatively rich compared to them. So we know something about it. But nevertheless,
Their ability to marshal assets was such that they created an important air force and airplane carriers and armies and that. And they went all the way up to Pearl Harbor and they took up a whole swath of the Asian continent all the way to Indonesia,
From North Korea to Indonesia. Now, in comes MacArthur, right? And in 1942, he sets up a commission in Honolulu the last three years and says, okay, we’re going to win that war, but how do we win the peace? And he says, we got to give property titles to the people below because
They keep on fighting for the sovereignty of Japan. And when you fight for sovereignty, dad, I want to die for my country. But nobody says, dad, I want to die for 353 Stewart Street. So he had that plan in mind, went into Japan and found out that within the feudal system,
All the records were there, not saying that Dave, Ryan, myself and Gustavo owned piece of property, but that within that feudal system, we had our space between the stone and this other tree. So what he did is he encouraged the local technocracy, well, MacArthur became the emperor
Of Japan to actually go out and title all of that. And they did it. And 30 years later, Japan’s GNP per capita was 15 times that of Peru’s, and it was the fastest growing nation in the world. So here, you will not find it in financial books. I haven’t, nor the Japanese,
They’d been flattened by two atomic bombs. They don’t like to write about that part of their history. And US military secrecy smudges. Plus, you delegated the whole process to a Japanese technocracy. So it never got really written up. What I’m trying to say is that securitization
Came to Japan and created one of the biggest capital markets, not because the economists started up, who said that most of what you need to know about economics, which is a discipline, is written up in economic books, who said that growth is something that only grows out of money,
Or things that are measurable. So think about it that way. And think also about this other thing. If China’s buying up the world from under your feet, from Africa to South America, with their currency and with their guarantees, it means they’ve cut on to what MacArthur
Actually discovered for Japan. And what they’re doing is they’re using it not to empower the farmers, but they’re using it to empower the Peruvian farmers or Brazilian farmers, but to empower themselves. In parallel, the United States over the last 30, 40 years, using something called
The Washington Consensus, which is let’s bring capitalism to the rest of the world, among other things, dedicated a few nickels and dimes to titling the whole place. We know it because we were funded by them. And so the surface of Africa, of the Middle East, the surface of Latin America,
Is all now titled and recorded. And they’re on the superficial part, the surface, is on the superficial part of the globe. So before you can get to the mineral rights that the Chinese are buying, you’ve got to be able to dig through the property superficial rights,
Which the United States did the titling of. So what you should be doing now, if MacArthur were alive, is gathering those farmers to say, get into the game. How much are you being paid for what the
Chinese are getting from the subsurface? And I have found that when I talk to the United States about that issue and where value is, I get much more substance out of a U.S. military than I get
Out of a U.S. banker, because I’m not too sure that what we call value is the exclusive domain of economists and especially money people, because they’re thriving on a system that exists today. In other words, what happens, and it’s all over the place to give you an idea that I’m not against
Bankers or anything, there’s a difference between knowing how and knowing why. When my ancestors, mainly the Spaniards, and your ancestors, wherever they came from, Germany, et cetera, crossed the ocean, they used compasses, right? Compasses is what you call it, right? To see
What’s north, right? They had no idea why they pointed north. We’ve been using it for 1,600 years. We just know it points north and it locates it. It’s only 1,600 years later that we found out that
It’s the North Pole as it gyrates. In other words, what we human beings know how to do, and this answers the previous question, is that we know how to do things before we know why we do things. We’re that smart. So what’s occurring now, as far as I’m concerned,
With everything that is virtual, the kind of domain that you work in, is that everybody in your domain and in banking knows how, but don’t know why. The advantage we South Americans and Chinese have is we desperately need to know why because we can’t start the how before the why
Comes into place. So we’re bound to displace you for at least a short amount of time until you catch on and you do what MacArthur did, which is hire us to help you figure out why you’re so successful. I’m saying this, of course, in a provocative manner, but there’s some truth to
That. Metamask Portfolio is your one-stop shop to navigate the world of DeFi, and now bridging seamlessly across networks doesn’t have to be so daunting anymore. With competitive rates and convenient routes, Metamask Portfolio’s bridge feature lets you easily move your tokens from
Chain to chain using popular Layer 1 and Layer 2 networks, and all you have to do is select a network you want to bridge from and where you want your tokens to go. From there, Metamask vets and curates the different bridging platforms to find the most decentralized, accessible,
And reliable bridges for you. To tap into the hottest opportunities in crypto, you need to be able to plug into a variety of networks, and nobody makes that easier than Metamask Portfolio. Instead of searching endlessly through the world of bridge options, click the bridge button on your
Metamask extension or head over to metamask.io slash portfolio to get started. Celo is the mobile-first, EVM-compatible, carbon-negative blockchain built for the real world, and now something big is happening. Introducing the Celo Layer 2. It’s a game-changing proposal that’s going to bring Celo’s rapidly growing ecosystem home to Ethereum. Vitalik has shared its excitement
For the Celo Layer 2 on the Celo Forum, so has Ben Jones from Optimism. But why? The Celo Layer 2 will bring huge advantages, like a decentralized sequencer, off-chain data availability, and one block finality. What does all that mean? Rock-solid security, a trustless bridge to Ethereum, and more
Real-world use cases for Ethereum without compromise. And real-world adoption is happening. Active addresses on Celo have grown over 500% in the last six months. With the Celo Layer 2, gas fees will stay low, and you can even pay for gas using ERC-20 tokens. But Celo is a
Community-governed protocol. This means that Celo needs you to weigh in and make your voice heard. Join the conversation in the Celo Forum. Follow at Celo Org on Twitter and visit Celo.org to shape the future of Ethereum. Arbitrum is the leading Ethereum scaling solution that is
Home to hundreds of decentralized applications. Arbitrum’s technology allows you to interact with Ethereum at scale, with low fees and faster transactions. Arbitrum has the leading DeFi ecosystem, strong infrastructure options, flourishing NFTs, and is quickly becoming the Web3 gaming hub. Explore the ecosystem at portal.arbitrum.io. Are you looking to
Permissionlessly launch your own Arbitrum Orbit chain? Arbitrum Orbit allows anyone to utilize Arbitrum’s secure scaling technology to build your own Orbit chain, giving you access to interoperable, customizable permissions with dedicated throughput. Whether you’re a developer, an enterprise, or a user, Arbitrum Orbit lets you take your project to new heights. All of these
Technologies leverage the security and decentralization of Ethereum. Experience Web3 development the way it was always meant to be. Secure, fast, cheap, and friction-free. Visit Arbitrum.io and get your journey started in one of the largest Ethereum communities.
No, I think there’s a lot of truth to that. And I think we have, maybe for a while, kind of the US actually knew why, but we’ve just forgotten because it’s been generations ago. I mean, when we talk to traditional finance people about money, just that the concept of like,
What is actually money? We find, Hernando, that they don’t have a compelling answer for us. They don’t actually know what money is. They may not even be aware of the fact that, you know,
5% of all what the US calls money is just that base money, that M0. And the other 95% is created by these systems of contract, you know? And so when you ask, what is money, a banker won’t be
Able to answer that question. But I think your framing of this is very fascinating. The best property rights system wins. Essentially, China, US, it’s in a race to title the world. And maybe blockchain is also part of that race to title the world. Maybe that’s what we’re kind of
Witnessing here. But I want to ask a question about the US right now. And it’s, you know, forgetting of the why, if that makes sense. Can you talk about what, we talked about property rights, what that means, but I want to just relate that to the word capital or capitalism.
And maybe you can explain this to us, because I think the term capitalism has now garnered some unsavory connotations in places in the West and maybe, you know, in the United States. There’s often this, this trope of like late stage capitalism, right? Capitalism is bad.
I’m wondering if you could give us your framing of what capital actually is. How does it relate to property rights? What are the goods and bads of capitalism? Well, capitalism, of course, it means different things to different people. Among other things, it means something different
To somebody who’s poor and has no capital, whatever that is, versus somebody who’s rich and has a lot of capital. It’s a friendly word. In the second case, it’s an unfriendly word. And in the first case, that’s number one. If you go to the origins, it doesn’t really help
Much as all sorts of interpretations. One is that it had to do with head of cattle. Capital comes from the Latin word capital. And the amount of head of capital that you had, this is a head of of cows and bulls indicated your relative wealth and they reproduced by themselves.
It was value that did not perish and that continually multiplied. And you could use them, the hoofs for chewing gum, the horns for making knives and the hides and, you know, and the milk and all of that. The original productive asset, I guess.
Correct. And then there’s one probably that is probably the most sophisticated of them all that I think Smart said somewhere, but I’m not too sure. Much more sophisticated, he said, because it’s an abstraction. How do you explain an abstraction?
Has anybody ever touched capital? Have you ever smelled capital? Have you ever seen capital? No. So you need it in the head, capital, right? Capital. And then if somebody says, all right, that looks like a lot of philosophy, you can back and say, well, how about energy?
Have you ever seen energy? Have you ever touched energy? Have you ever smelt energy? No. What it does is it lays a conceptual framework that allows you to see something that does exist, measure it and harness it like a lake in the high mountains of Peru.
The water drops, right? Gravitational value. Then it turns turbines around and that’s mechanical value, then kinetic energy, blah, blah, until you get electricity and you’re not able to charge it anywhere in particular because of water falling. I mean, it’s great for a honeymoon or a visit,
A touristic visit, but it’s only at the end when it goes to the wires that you can catch it, which is why the Chinese are buying it at the end where you can actually catch the value.
Now, the idea, this race, the title in, excuse me, the reason that it’s got such a bad name is because it hasn’t, many people do not see it as having been distributed in a justified manner. That’s why even the Chinese President Xi Jinping of China does not talk about Chinese capitalism.
He talks about the modernization of Marxism. They’re trying to get away from the word capital. They don’t like to be called Chinese capitalism. I think that that’s basically the reason. Why does the United States, why do Western countries do it bigger? People,
Unfortunately, confuse it with money. If we could bring it down, and that’s what I like very much about the blockchain aspect of it and the desire Web 3 to democratize information is to understand that a lot of abstract things do have a value, but it shouldn’t just be, I got a better education,
Knowledge is good because for the sake of knowledge, and then you quote Saint Augustine, and you quote Plato, et cetera, but actually show that information is a crucial part of the whole thing and that strangely and interestingly enough now, the countries that are growing the fastest
In the world happen to be communist countries. I mean, it’s that bad. They’re doing it not by distributing more to the private sector, but by hoarding more in favor of state power. So, this is a good time. This is a good time for anyone who wants to change things. And
What I surmise from your question, but it only comes to mind right now, it might be the moment not to go out and fight and defend words. I’m for capitalism. Look, if it’s a bad word in Latin America and you’re coming to my country, Latin America,
You say I’m all for capitalism. It’s a mistake to keep on counting capitalism. It’s a mistake. It’s as if the word dumb, I’m called Mr. Dumb, and that means nothing in Spanish. When I go to the stage, I’m called Mr. Dumb. You want to change your name.
Well, I think frankly, the real problem is the tendency of certain people like me, like democracy, and we like property rights, and we like freedom. We get really angry if the Chinese or the Russians or whoever it is use those three words. Well, they call
Themselves free democratic republics and all that. Well, the time has come to find another word. I mean, don’t fight for a word. It’s fascinating, Hernando, in that we’re talking this whole conversation about symbols and words are just another symbol, aren’t they? And they can be
Imbued with all sorts of different power. I want to run this by you as we talk about maybe blockchains and crypto and why we’re so excited about it and part of the genesis for this entire conversation. I just want to run by from us absorbing your learnings and then being in the
Crypto space what we actually see in this technology. And I want you to tell us if it makes sense or not. So here’s what we see in blockchains, Hernando. We see a public decentralized property rights system that anybody with an internet connection can use. So it’s completely borderless.
You don’t have to win kind of the genetic lottery of being born in a country with a good property rights system. If you have access to the internet, you get this right by default. It is the global permissionless, non-geographic property rights system. And so that means anyone in the world,
If you’re using a property rights system like Bitcoin, for example, if you’re using that blockchain, anyone can own Bitcoin as property and they have custody of their own keys. They don’t have to go through a third party or a centralized intermediary or on a public blockchain
Like Ethereum, anyone can register new property so they can mint a token. What is a token? It’s just a symbolic representation of property or it could be actual digital property on chain. Or we have these things called NFTs that are similar. These are specific types of non-fungible
Tokens. So think of that in the real world as like a house or something. And then what we can do is we can take loans out against this property on the blockchain. We call this decentralized finance. We have this whole cottage industry of collateralized loans that are collateralized or
Backed by digital property. And it’s all public. So what we see in blockchain and crypto and technologies like Bitcoin and Ethereum is just one giant asset registry system for the world. What we further see, Hernando, is that this is all public goods functionality that nation states
Provide and used to be the sole providers for, the only game in town. And now what we think we’re doing is we are separating property rights from the state. The first concept of crypto is let’s separate money from state and we’ll call that Bitcoin. That’s cool. But to your point earlier,
Money is just a subset of property. Now we can separate all property from the state and maybe rebuild this thing from the ground up. And the last point I’ll make here is something you alluded to. You were talking about might versus consensus, basically. And might is the power of the nation
State. It is kind of the violence. It is the sovereignty aspect of it. But consensus is more bottom up in property rights. And it’s no mistake, Hernando, that we call our entire blockchain systems, it rests on consensus technology. It’s like bottom up, decentralized from the ground up.
We think we’re able to launch this entire property rights system for the world without violence, without might, with it being completely opt-in. That is why we are doing this podcast. That is why we are so excited about this technology. And you know much more about property rights and capital
And all of these things and unlocking the potential of economies than us, because you’ve been studying this for your entire life, it sounds like. What do you think of this take? Are we just starry-eyed dreamers? Or do you think this is actually realistic? Do you see any value in these
Blockchains that we’re creating here? Oh, of course there’s enormous value because it’s set up to, as you say, capture values that are part of the social contract. You decide how you’re going to name it, how you’re going to put it. You’ve got these NFTs.
There’s an enormous amount of flexibility. The question again here is, I would say, how you sell it? First of all, let me tell you that I don’t study it. I’m not a professor at university. I just go out and title and change government systems throughout the world.
And I never use the word blockchain. And I rarely use the word property or the word capital because it’s a bad word. I don’t use Mr. Dumb. I do not use that. You use the word title intentionally?
No, I can use title. I can use, depending what, you know, it depends what it means locally, you know. Sweetie pie might mean something in one place and in the other it’s ridiculing you because you’re too effeminate or whatever. It means different things in different places.
You want to adapt the vocabulary to the local stuff, right? If I’m writing a book that’s going to be published in the United States, of course, property rights right up front. Americans like property rights. But I would use different things. So look, let me tell you what I would do. What
Comes to mind, of course, because this hasn’t been planned. I would say that the first thing is that when you start talking about blockchain, people think Bitcoin, right? And then Bitcoin goes up and it goes down and goes up and it goes down. And then the whole economic community that
Doesn’t like this says money was there to give you standards of stability. This isn’t stability. I mean, this is a crap game. This is going to gambling. So what you want to do, maybe, is start off with an example of how it helps something else. So what naturally I would do,
Because that’s what I would try and do is the following thing. Sorry, because I live from from use, from day to day. I would come in and say, tell the United States government that is being outspent and outcapitalized by China. All right, we go back to that,
But that’s what I’ve been looking into lately. They have spent on buying mines and natural resources in the last year three times, or let’s say they’ve invested three times more capital in various forms than the amount of money that you’ve disbursed for help for supporting
The Ukraine against Russia three times more. So anybody comes around and says that China is a poorer country? Yes, they got less money than you do, but they got more capital. In other words, they know how to gather value and get to some place doesn’t necessarily mean
That they can use that money to buy other things, but they know how to invest in infrastructure and things that potentially have a value because they know how to pin a value on things in the future that you don’t have. All right, they’ve learned something. All right, now if you say,
Ah, you know, De Soto is probably a Marxist, but no, I’m actually a Jeffersonian. The first person to talk about the fact that money could have a fictitious capital could be fictitious or could be real was not Marx, was Jefferson, 1819, when Marx was only one year old. He said
This country is going to the dogs because we’re bankers are allowed to throw out all sorts of paper on the market and they’re screwing the rest of us up. And I dread what’s happening to America. 1819, he was no longer president of the United States. Marx took it up later, first thing.
Second thing, now 100 or 200 years later, income Marxists, because Chinese are Marxists in a more healthy sense of the word, are going into your backyard, buying the subsoil, right? And basically they’ve specialized in taking government sovereign paper and using it to acquire the subsurface,
Because the subsurface all over the world belongs to government. Even in the United States, you’ll say, no, it belongs to private property. Yes, it does not. It belongs to government. The moment you drill a hole in America and you own the subsurface, the government will be all over
You. One way or other, it’s where the strategic goods are. And it’s always been that way for the last 2,400 years. Now, here’s what I would do if I were in the situation of a blockchainer. I would
Say, put me to the test, all right? The test is the following thing. We, the United States, with nickels and dimes have helped title, it’s a revolution nobody’s seen, but you’ve done it since the last 40 years. That was behind MacArthur’s plans for Asia. That was a fulcrum
Of General George Marshall’s plans for Europe. I have a feeling the US military, no more than US politicians, they actually wanted to enforce markets and property. And you actually spent, because it takes a little money to title it. It’s all titled. Now, what I would do then at
That moment is show how all of these surface titles that poor farmers own in Latin America, if I put them inside the blockchain system and symbolize them and can connect them to the capital markets of the United States, which is not where you issue, not only issue money,
It’s where all the people that you have are experts at assigning value to things. You see, the Chinese have a technocracy that has formulas of all sorts for assigning value to purchase it, because they don’t necessarily use prices. They don’t believe in that.
The Marxists believe in other structural cost phenomena for establishing value. Well, you believe in prices. So you say, now what would happen if I take the right of Peruvian farmers to authorize the extraction of uranium, lithium, copper, which we’ve got much more than all of you
And which you need for whatever you’re going to do in the future, rare earth, and put it on the market? Now you’ve got an argument, because what you’re doing is you’re, one, you’re helping the poor, second, you’re fighting for the interests of your nation, and it’s easy to understand.
Locally, quinoa, which we Peruvians have most of in the world, quinoa, coca leaves, which we Peruvians have most in the world, is worthless in this country. It catches its value in the United States and in Western markets. So if you can illustrate how you can take, and it’s peanuts
What is required, how you can take this and introduce it into your capital markets, and then at that moment, you will at that moment be able to forget this idea of capitalism. What you will be doing is putting into value what the majority of the poor of the world own,
Which is they’ve covered it. Let me explain, maybe this requires another explanation. In the last 40 years, tremendous things have happened outside the United States. There’s been decolonization. The French left, the Germans left, the Russians lost their colony. As a matter
Of fact, the Soviet Union collapsed. Mass migrations, you see that in films all the time, mass migration, squatting, invasions, this, that, and the other. Eventually, what all governments have to do with your help is allow developing countries to master the situation by setting up local titling systems.
None of these guys who in the United States did titling systems necessarily understood capitalism. They probably didn’t like capitalism. If you’re a Peace Corps fellow in the United States, from what I know, capitalism is a bad word. But yet, they titled and made these little
People capitalists, potentially. What you’ve got to do is get on that bandwagon. The moment that you do that, of course, then you will be able to illustrate much better what blockchain means. One of the obstacles for this is, of course, your big problem in the United States,
Referring to my part of the world. As America first did, as you become more isolationist, you want to industrialize yourself. One of the problems that you don’t understand is we’re not like the United States and the rest of the world. We are not like you. When you own a home in the
United States, you are like, talk about films of my day, James Dean. You make a hole on their surface and the oil that comes out is yours. Or at least you got a preferred right to it. What you don’t
Realize, that’s the only country in the world that that happens. The subsoil does not belong in the rest of the world to the private owner. But the reason you do get James Dean’s is because what you’ve got is the door to the subsurface. That oil and that gold and that uranium is worth
Nothing if it doesn’t cross the surface. That’s how that surface is valued. I’m making this more and more long. Get a good cause, not something that relates you to instability, not something that relates you to gaming. Wow, I see my kids shooting each other on the screen.
Not something that makes you rich one day and poor the other. Get into something that brings peace to the world, something that brings development to the world and then find another name for yourself. I think, Fernando, what I’m hearing you say is find something, find some
Utility out of these blockchain systems that we have that makes us legitimate, legitimize ourselves to the world. Well, yes, it’s an application. It’s a little bit like nuclear. You have nuclear power. If all you dedicate your nuclear power to is blowing up people, it’s not going to be very
Popular. But if you say it helps you generate energy, save the lives of children in hospital, et cetera, it’s like everything. Friedrich von Hayek said, what’s the knife? You can use the knife to kill somebody or you can use the knife to do all sorts of wonderful things. The problem
That you’ve probably got is that it’s only being used for Bitcoin. Why go to the monetary field? Because forget about early Catholic or Muslim philosophy. That’s vague enough. Get into something concrete. Get into something concrete that everybody will understand. You might
Even bring a revolution to China because you can tell the farmers who don’t have a property right that they should also have a right to those. You really force them around. I mean, this is it. And I think if I were to kind of summarize your advice, and it’s excellent
Advice for us, and I almost want to kind of recruit you to help us do some of this. But if I were to summarize this advice, what you’re saying, Hernando, is Bitcoin and the speculative assets, that’s a massive distraction. We have to reframe this and make the US understand that this
Is a race to title the world. And what they want to do is title the world faster than China does. And if you partner with blockchain, if you adopt blockchain technologies, the win for the US is
That it can outcompete China to help title the world. And by the way, this is the American way because it’s bottom up. It’s a technology of freedom. It’s opt in. It’s not a centralized database. It’s not controlled. But let me maybe get you to comment on two of the other enemies
That we sort of face of this type of message because we’ve tried. And again, it’s a matter of like, you know, they’re not listening to us yet. One is the enemy of hubris. And the second is the enemy of incumbents. The enemy of hubris is basically America’s on top. Okay. And so many,
I think, in the US government believe that. So if you talk to our chairman, Gary Gensler, of the Securities Exchange Commission, the SEC, he says crypto is useless. We got securities, you know, correct in the Securities Act of 1933. And you can see that because we have developed
Billions and hundreds of billions and trillions of dollars in capital markets. So we already know how to do this. We don’t need crypto. There’s a hubris aspect to this is the US already has it right. And the second is this incumbents aspect to it. So the beneficiaries of the existing system,
They’ll call it like some of the bankers, for instance, just all sorts of different beneficiaries of the existing system. They don’t want change, Hernando. Okay. And so they don’t like this either. And these are kind of the dual objections that we’re really facing
When we when we talk to, you know, talk to those in power and those in politics in the US about this. And this is why the current government administration in the US is basically crypto
Hostile. So I’m wondering if you could help with that. How do we deal with the hubris? How do we deal with the incumbent advantage and the vested interests that, you know, dictate our politics? Well, to tell the truth, I’m doing something now in the course of the last two years.
In my, shall we say, line of business, which is putting property rights, modernizing government in different parts of the world, I work with about 30 heads of state. The way I would sort of go about it is this. All right.
Remember what I said before, we in Peru have probably the biggest amount of electric metals, right? Copper, tin, gold, silver, and together with Argentine now, the lithium that allows you to store and transport clean energy, right? You do that,
And you might win your war in Ukraine. You do that, and you might empower people. Now, who decides that? All right. Not me. I can mobilize people. I know how to get votes. I can mobilize people.
But I’m not the person that needs the stuff. It’s people who, at a level of very simple people who own the surface of the earth, from Zulus in Africa, right, to Berbers in North Africa, to Mongolians, I’m a good friend of the president of Mongolia, to Peruvians, they know that. So what
Did I decide to do? I got all these people together, right, that own the surface of the mining corridor of Peru, where you’ve got the biggest sources, reserves of copper in the world, all right, and it goes from Apurima to Cusco to Arequipa. That’s the mining corridor. They’re
Outweighing the sticks, and that’s where the Chinese are coming in to drill it out. And I said, why don’t you do the following thing? Why don’t you tell your story to the Americans? Tell the story to the Americans. Tell it to the armed forces that what you really want
Is to be given a title, and remind them that that’s what they did to win the war in Japan. Remind them that that’s what they did to win the war against Russia, because they actually did it.
There is military history. So what I did is I put them all together, and of the known available reserves of electric, let’s call them electric metals in Peru, these are about $2.5 trillion, ready to go, all right? I managed to get the owners of the surface of
One trillion of these people that are surrounded by Chinese and are fighting with Chinese and want an alternative competition, which is only natural. That’s them. And then I said, now let’s go to the United States. I’ve got appointments. I can get an appointment
With Senator Ted Cruz, old friend. I can get an appointment with Senator Chris Dodd, President Biden’s best friend, and who’s also a friend of mine. And we can sit there, and I also know Henry Kissinger, let’s talk to them. And I also know, I don’t know, but I admire
The Southern Command’s general, who’s a woman, by the way, called Laura Richardson. And let’s tell them what you know. So it’s not just me, an interesting opinion. These are guys who lead millions of people and own this stuff and can shut down what you can’t do, which is they can shut
Down a Chinese plant. You can’t. They can. That was four months ago. I couldn’t get the visas to travel into the United States. Really? Why? I couldn’t. Well, the reply to that, of course, is that many Peruvians, if you’re rich, want to have a house in Miami. You’ve got enough of
Those. And then the other ones are people from El Salvador to whatever it is, want a job. And you’re building a wall, and I can understand that there’s too many migrants. But you should be able to distinguish the difference between these guys who don’t want to live in the United
States. We’re talking about 11 leaders. I couldn’t do it. Now, the reply to that is that what I think has got to be done is get to remember what Bertrand Russell talked about, little patches of color. You got one patch of color. I got another patch of color. So what you
Blockchain guys have got to do, you crypto guys have got to do, who have got the money and we’ve got the people, is put it together. And so let’s not go to the United States. Let’s not get the visas. Who did you call? Andreessen, Mr. Andreessen, Mark Andreessen, Horowitz, all these guys.
Get them on a plane, come down here. Three photographers, Forbes, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, whatever you want to. Bring them down here, let’s get photographed. That’ll get a message across. Because right now, when President Biden has sent a budget to help Israel, another
Budget to continue helping Ukraine, your senators are standing up and saying, that’s a lot of money. This is nothing. All we’re asking them, all we’re telling them is you want to use a blockchain system that gets them close to Wall Street. Your market will decide whether you want those
Minerals or not. But of course you want them. But you see what’s happened is that, I repeat, it’s a mistake to think that financial people know the origins of finance. Remember the how? No. That comes to right away. It comes to that. General Douglas MacArthur, I don’t think he fully
Understood what was proper. He just simply knew that it worked. As a matter of fact, his objective wasn’t to get the economy going. His objective was to destroy the feudal system of Japan, which, because it wasn’t working, had forced the establishment of Japan to say the problem
That we have is not distributing land to our farmers. We just don’t have enough land. I mean, Japan is a little place. Let’s go out and conquer the rest of Asia. So he knew that that was a false
Argument because it was the feudal class that didn’t want to share. But that was the cause of Japanese feudalism, vertically integrated, going out and causing war all over the place. Why? Because the Japanese government of then had decided that the other way to not only get land,
But to discipline those rambunctious farmers was to put them in uniform and make them fight for their country. Patriotism was something good. So he said, I’ve got to get rid of that. His objective wasn’t economic. His objective was to empower the little people so that Japan would
Never resuscitate, fascism wouldn’t come back, and he needed to create a bulwark against communism as your ally, Chiang Kai-shek, was being defeated by the communist Mao Zedong. All right. So there are many things that have a solution, but you’ve got to get out of your
Just traditional financial field. You’ve got to get into things that people did. Like when there was stomach medicine and somebody added sugar to it and converted stomach medicine into Coca-Cola, things have functions. And one of the functions is not money. One of the functions is to
Make people wealthy, and then somebody will connect those dots very fast. But start talking, not necessarily only to the financial community, because you’re talking to the same lodge. Hernando, this has been an absolutely fantastic conversation. And I think we heard at the end of
This conversation kind of a call to the crypto community, basically. And so you’ve made a compelling case today that property rights are the most important, are the hallmark of all economic progress. And we are now really in a race to title the world. And there are really
Two options of this, and crypto maybe presents a third. The first is the US can help title the world. The second is China can title the world. Or the third is maybe blockchain. And so I think
This is a call to the crypto community and those listening. Basically, we talk so much about these things we called tokenized assets and real world assets. And mainly we’re talking about things that we know from our existing legal system, bonds and things like this, and even stable coins. And
Certainly that’s a part of it. But what about going down to Peru, for instance, and bringing real world assets of Peruvian mining companies and facilities on chain? How can we help some of these emerging economies? How can we help title the rest of the world and show the US what this looks like
And make our mark? I think rather than getting obsessed this next cycle with the next NFT that is pumping and the next speculative asset of Bitcoin, I think this is a compelling call from you, Hernando. So I appreciate this. And we certainly learned a lot. Is there anything else
You would leave us with as we depart here? Sure. I think we’re on the right track here. I would just simply say that you already help title the world. What you’re going to do is tokenize it. You’re going to take that title, which is not negotiable internationally and make it negotiable
Global because what we’ve got underneath our earth is only valuable in the measure in which it reaches industrialized countries. Very simple. So what you want to do is not say that you’re going to title because then people will get scared and say, but what do I know about titling?
It’s already titled. What you’ve got to do is tokenize. And the guys who know how to do it are your digital guys. That’s the first kind of thing. The second thing is not only don’t expect your financiers not to understand this first shot, they’ll get into it once they see that
There’s a value and that they can make money. Nor can you think of asking your miners to understand it because they’re already around, but your miners, what they know is how to dig stuff out of the ground. They’re engineers, they’re foremen. What you want to do is take your argument
To your opinion community, the news, those that have opinions, that have criteria and the politicians, because they’re the ones that have the most to gain from this. You want to get people who want to stop spending trillions of dollars,
Billions rather of dollars on foreign wars when you can win them by just simply tokenizing the property rights. In other words, don’t forget, a property right that I can only use to sell to my neighbors are in Peru. Peru’s got a whole bunch of quinoa. Peru’s got all the varieties of potatoes
That you want, et cetera. But they’re valueless here. You want to bring them to where they have value. So you want to bring in the people who see that value immediately. And those are your political representatives, those concerned with the budget. And what’s great is you’re going to
Tell me, well, when do we do this? Well, I can tell you the time. I don’t need to know America for that. The time is this, election time. And you’re right in the middle of it. Because the first thing
Politicians want to do is get elected. And your politics today are pretty fierce. So you want the Republicans to come and say, I started the Washington Consensus. And you want to have the Peace Corps people say, no, you didn’t. I did starting the titling and all that. Get those guys.
Those are the guys who move opinion. And then the PR guys of the mining companies will understand what’s behind it. But for the moment, the guys in the mining companies just simply don’t even understand the value of the property. They delegate that to the Peruvian partner, to the
Brazilian partner. I think what you want to do is say to blockchain, say to your financiers, we’ve got a great product here, but we’ve been using it to do things that don’t inspire confidence. We can inspire confidence here, number one. And number two, get the guys who think big.
To get the guys that can think outside the box. As a fantastic way to end this, Hernando. And I think your message is show us a path to tokenize the world, a call for crypto to unlock capital, unlock economic prosperity. And I think it’s
No coincidence that the person I think that most understands, which is you from everything I’ve read and has awoken the world to the value of property rights, you’ve caught on to crypto, which is somewhat fascinating and I think consequential because you’re looking at
Property rights from first principles. And so you see the value of blockchain, you see the merits of tokens, and that is a tell in and of itself. So Hernando, I want to thank you so much for spending some time with David and myself and the crypto community today. This has been one of
My favorite conversations. Before you sign me off, just one last thing that occurred to me now. We had a funny letter that came in about three months ago. A company that said, I don’t know it’s true or not, that said they worked for Elon Musk and would we be interested in helping him
Title asteroids? That’s pretty far away. We can help him title and own the minerals that we have in Peru without taking a rocket ship. I mean, one of the characteristics to us of the United States
Is all these guys who got very rich and not content with that, they also want to save the world. That’s your key. There we go. Let’s title the world first before we go title the solar system. I love that you’re the one using tokenize, not me because
That’s the word we often use. Hernando, thank you so much for joining us. Thank you for the opportunity. Bankless Nation, I’ll include some links for you below. The first is a link to the mystery of capital. That is a Hernando’s book, which is absolutely foundational if you want to understand
This in more detail. Another is a podcast episode that we did called Reinventing the Internet, where is actually the Genesis, Marc Andreessen actually referred us to Hernando’s work and talks a little bit about it there. Got to end with this, of course, risks and disclaimers. None of this has
Been financial advice. It never is on Bankless. Neither was it political advice, although Hernando does have some fantastic advice for the US and its adoption of tokenization technology moving forward. But we are headed west. This is the frontier. It’s not for everyone,
But we’re glad you’re with us on the bankless journey. Thanks a lot.
20 Comments
17
my favorite economist is on Bankless. wow! it's a small World. let's tokenize it.
Algorand has the first tokenized Airbnb on Lofty. I know you fellas aren’t Algo fans but algorand founder Silvio Micali is mentioned in bitcoin white paper multiple times. Don’t snooze too long on algorand.
greater scope and utlilization of tokenized property titles can only be successful using blockchain if they are onboarded with nation states as a whole and not just the property owners… the value transfer that happens with virtual assets that have a certain market value can't be replicated and actualized for tokenized assets in the physical realm i.e land if there's a whole society of a stature of a nation state that is wholly comfortable with this idea
Want early access to episodes and a fully ad-free experience? Sign up to become a Bankless Citizen https://bankless.cc/GoAdFree
Yes, Love it!
despite being pretty anti-socialist, some of the most valuable discussion's I've ever had on figuring out what the hell property is and what property rights are have come from talking to socialists
IP is illegitimate, for example, and is a terrible government interference in the economy, which slows innovation by decades, not natural
Great interview, one of my favs for sure
On the contrary, I would argue that the West and similar developed countries with sophisticated property rights have more and prosper is due to little more than colonial theft from those that don't think about conquering as much, and who also don't dwell on what is property. An example are erhe Native American Indians who were essentially always communists (not forced to be so by the invaders). An analogy – Europeans weren't the best at acquiring land because they were also good at making weapons – they were good at taking from others and therefore focused on having good weapons to do so.
This is amazing. Land in my village in Nigeria has not been recorded yet. The cities and townships have, but we still use private affidavits with signatures and witnesses to exchange ownership. We also still use oral affidavit to determine ownership and it's been like that for generations. My home in the village may go straight to Blockchain Tokenization.
These are the conversations I watch bankless for 💯
A conceptually stunning conversation well worth the 100 mins to watch, thanks for this 🙂
Decentralized Science (DeSci) is my answer to Hernando's call for a blockchain use-case that's not related to instability (price volatility of bitcoin etc).
In particular, tokenizing early stage IP via IP-NFTs, making them liquid & fractional (like VITA-FAST by VitaDAO). Most of crypto/DeFi seems to outsiders like gambling with play-money, in a bubble.
Funding real world medical research and actually making new therapies to help everyone be healthier for longer.. THAT is something that society overlooked but crypto didn't! We had warp-speed for the COVID crisis, but aging & the silver tsunami is a much bigger crisis that the mainstream doesn't see.
The crypto community (Vitalik, Brian Armstrong, Balaji, Hal Finney, etc..) truly understands that we need to approach medicine in a different way, not just finance. To bring aging under medical control.
De Soto's book The Mystery of Capital literally changed my life. I can't wait to see this.
Bro just engaged mass coordination: tokenize Israel and Palestine to create peace, tokenize property around critical infrastructure.
And the loss of property rights in the west is indicative of it's decline , first it was in consumer goods where it is almost lost (cars, phones, computers…), then in money/finance (you have a permission not ownership) and in the end it will come for realestate and everything else. The famous "You will own nothing …"
Sr. de Soto – Your latest book has profoundly impacted our efforts to bring traditionally forcefed, centrally overpowered communities in Paraguay and on Kauai into decentralized, enlightened DAO systems on immutable blockchains.❤ Your perspective, rooted in historical curiosity and unconditional love of humanity, seminally articulates why defining value is not verbal but empathic. You are a hero and knight of consilience, a primary reason we opened a second homebase in South America.
❤To the Bankless podcast – thank you for front running before the new economy had a front.. or legs. You spotlight voices like Mr. de Soto's that make projects like ours socially acceptable, and essentially possible. His book was so seminal in grounding the buzzing concepts that motivate our mission and we reference it constantly. If anyone needs help obtaining his work to study, let me know. I'm happy to sponsor that gift of knowledge.❤
1h:28m. Serious wisdom here…. layers.
incredible episode. Good work @Bankless. Cheers
Comentario en Español aquí, los subtítulos en español no están sincronizados, si pudieran arreglarlo seria genial, por favor 🙌