DJ Audits runs over a child while auditing. I give you the legal analysis.
Incident footage is Crown copyright held by Leicestershire Police – used here under fair dealing.
Other footage is copyright of Banaman, also used here under fair dealing: https://www.youtube.com/@BANAMAN
Link to my notice dated 17th. September 2023 served on DJ Audits and his read receipt:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wjnDJrSwTtnnfkeLkpo89iAz0N-kN9EF?usp=sharing
Google Map of the junction:
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Western+Leicester+Fire+Station/@52.6465404,-1.1817606,17z/data=!4m6!3m5!1s0x48776084433e5495:0x40204c35fdfb2da4!8m2!3d52.6468968!4d-1.1784615!16s%2Fg%2F1wn_5m6p?entry=ttu
Google Street View of the junction:
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.6464811,-1.1797761,3a,75y,13.08h,97.07t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWcArK22B2Y-yZgriigxo-Q!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
The Highway Code:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code
Rules 170-183 of The Highway Code (Road junctions):
https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/road-junctions.html
Rule 204 of The Highway Code:
https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/road-users-requiring-extra-care.html
‘Reduced Sensitivity to Visual Looming Inflates the Risk Posed by Speeding Vehicles When Children Try to Cross the Road’ – a study by Professor John Wann and others:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956797611400917
Section 2 of the Road Traffic Act 1988:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/2
Section 2A of the Road Traffic Act 1988:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/2A
Section 3 of the Road Traffic Act 1988:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/3#:~:text=If%20a%20person%20drives%20a,is%20guilty%20of%20an%20offence.%5D
Section 170 of the Road Traffic Act 1988:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/170
Schedule 2 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/53/schedule/2
Section 24(1)(a) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/section/24/enacted?view=plain
Section 5 of the Criminal Law Act 1967:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/58/section/5
Banaman’s video – New YouTuber @DJAUDITS:
Section 127(2) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/43/section/127
Section 5 of the Interpretation Act 1978:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1978/30/section/5
Schedule 1 of the Interpretation Act 1978:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1978/30/schedule/1
Section 64(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/45/section/64
Channel Theme: Credit to Ashutosh/@ashutoshmusic
https://www.ashutoshmusic.com/music
26 Comments
Always remember, the flak is the heaviest when you're right over the target area💖You're videos are great and making an impact and these narcs with their massive egos can't stand that👍😃
Christ what a load of drivel
What utter rubbish clickbait!, DJ went through the lights on green, cyclist went through on red!, clearly without looking either way!, thankfully recorded on a dash mounted camera! this video is a false flag and seems much more like a sour grapes vendetta to me!.
Lol what a load of bollox
15.15 into the video you can see the fire engine up ahead with its lights flashing
Hey street auditor I debated with u with uk meet the tyrants but this I applause u on bc if DJ has done this I’m very disappointed since it’s a child and he said sod not very professional or nice on his behalf well done bro
This makes DJ filming the cement truck that rolled over even worse. No one would want to be filmed in the aftermath of an accident. He could have shown some sensitivity towards the driver of the truck, and the company, who were obviously having a bad day. If he filmed it after this incident, it is terrible, not sure when his accident happened in relation to the cement truck. Obtuse is the word.
Looooooooool click bait at its best, tryna make a quick buck, reaching at its finest ffs 😂, glad no one was injured
Get a life man, and no thanks for wasting my time.
Cyclists should open their eyes they went through a red light typical Cyclists gets knocked down because of their stupidly and car driver gets the blame
and maybe the child was obscured from view by the A pillar of the vehicle, and he went through a red light ..
your just trying to find something to waffle about, iam pretty sure the police would have prosecuted him if they thought he was guilty .
He did start moving on an amber light which got him to the middle of the junction very quickly but the cyclist would probably have gone through an amber light as well. 2 road users going through amber lights met in the middle. Amber means STOP if safe to do so.
He should be charged and banned from driving
What a load of rubbish
what a load of bs
You highlight one incident! Christ almighty, every time I go out for 5 mins there are at least 3 near misses. I have driven over a million miles and evry time I go out there are nut cases on the roads.
Your content is shite…he had an accident 2 years ago….and? He had a green light and started to go…kid had the red light and ran it…there was an accident…..AND?
Dj Audits is proof that a turd can sprout limbs and work a camera, oh and hit cyclists while driving…
Dj Audits is proof that a turd can sprout limbs and work a camera, oh and hit cyclists while driving…
Total nothing burger from the pettiest sounding narrator ever.
It would be useful if you started the footage from earlier that you have published to show context such as any road signs/other vehicles/traffic lights/hazards. Without context this video is a fail. I will also point out that the child who passed through the red light did not look. It appears that the child was at fault here but again, without context an opinion can't really be made.
You are very good at twisting a tail. I'd wager you could look a person in the eye and tell a lie with a straight face.
In the US we call your type a DEMOCRAT.
A young child on a bike has no situational awareness, and a man that has a duty of care for all road users period
because he is a licensed driver hits said child.
Kid jumped a red light and did'nt look. There was an impact. Driver not at fault. End of.
has he pi..ed you off in the passed?
I really think its wrong to be doing other things while driving. And it is also wrong to shame people on one mistake that end up with a collision.
Its sad really that child got hit by the car. And i hope the child is ok. You don't know how he is as a driver based on one mishap.
At the end of the video i guess you give your opion about DJ being a unsafe driver. That is not a fact. Because you don't know that don't you?
I am not sure i like these kind of videos.
Pls stay with facts and if you want to give your opion say it is in your opion that……….
Greetings from the Netherlands,,
Kitty.