Join me as I delve into ‘The Unknown Soldier’ Movie! This compelling tale, exploring the Finnish Invasion of the Soviet Union in 1942 to recapture their Territory of Karelia which the Soviet Union took during the Winter War of 1939! The Unknown Soldier beautifully intertwines elements of history, drama, and suspense as it explores the history of this event! The Unknown Soldier scores 7.7/10 on IMDB and in my opinion is one of the Best and most realistic War Movies ever made!

    Get your free Audible Book by using our Audible Trial Link below: https://amzn.to/3pjn5n7

    Sign up to Amazon Prime and get your free trial using our Channel’s link below:

    https://amzn.to/3r1YHXC

    It costs you nothing extra to use these links and it helps to support the channel at the same time:

    This Movie scores 7.7/10 on IMDB. This Movie was written by Vaino Linna, Aku Louhimies and Jari Olavi Rantala. This Movie was directed by Aku Louhimies. This Movie stars Eero Aho, Johannes Holopainen and Jussi Vatanen amongst others. Please visit https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4065552/ for the full cast list. This Movie was produced by Elokuvaosakeyhtiö Suomi 2017, Kvikmyndafélag Íslands and Belgian Scope Pictures. The copyright to the full original content is held by Elokuvaosakeyhtiö Suomi 2017. The copyright for this video is held by Jay’s Retro Reactions.

    Legal and Copyright Contract: By clicking on, reviewing or making a copyright claim on this video you agree to all of the below terms and conditions and to the jurisdiction of the Courts of Ireland to resolve any copyright claims and/or disputes in relation to this video. You also agree that this contract will supersede any other agreement, past, present or future in relation to this video. Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of Ireland, 2000, Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that or another work or of a performance of a work shall not infringe any copyright in the work where the criticism or review is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. In this Part, “sufficient acknowledgement” means an acknowledgement identifying the work concerned by its title or other description and identifying the author. The Principal Act, as amended in 2019, is amended, by the substitution of the following section for section 221: Fair dealing with a performance or recording for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another performance or recording, or of a work, shall not infringe any of the rights conferred by this Part. Fair dealing with a recording of a performance for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche shall not infringe the copyright in that work. In this Part, ‘fair dealing’ means the making use of a performance or recording which has been lawfully made available to the public for a purpose and to an extent which will not unreasonably prejudice the interests of the rights owner where such use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. As per the Judgement on the 26 April 2022 in the CJEU Case C-401/19, Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the EU: it was noted in that judgement that the interpretation of Article 17(7), second paragraph, requires that member states permit users of online sharing services are authorised to upload and make available content generated by themselves for the specific purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody or pastiche. This video is for the purposes of quotation, criticism, review and parody and falls within the criteria set out by that judgement and the mandatory requirements of the EU Copyright Directive For any and all claims of copyright the following evidence will be required: – Evidence of Copyright or Related Copyright rights – Evidence of breach of copyright exceptions as noted above – Evidence that the video has negatively impacted the market share of the original work and that the copyright holder has lost revenue as a result of the video – Evidence that it was not reasonable or fair to use the amount of the copyright work utilised in the video – Evidence of the video being re-edited to constitute what forms fair use under copyright law Note: All attempts at fraudulent copyright claims such as those made by non-copyright holders will be reported to the police as attempted fraud! If you make a false copyright claim under law, a copyright claim that is not compatible with the law such as fair dealing or fair usage and/or a false claim by misrepresentation you agree that you will reimburse the owner of this video to the tune of EUR 250,000 and that your costs and claims will be limited to the amount of revenue earned by this video.

    #war #warmovies #finland #downfall #cinema #europe #euro #reaction #reactionvideo #unitedstates #unitedkingdom #australia #canada #ireland #action #actionmovies

    36 Comments

    1. 23:57 Asumaniemi (the guy who got shot) didn't really understand the severity of the war. He didn't really believe that he could die at any moment. To him this was just a game. He loved to fight.

    2. 13:30 The character of undersergeant (later sergeant) Antero Rokka is based on real war hero named Viljami Pylkäs. The author of the book Väinö Linna fought alongside with Pylkäs.

    3. Thank you for your extensive review – as many have mentioned previously, it really offered a fresh, expert point of view to a story that's very dear for us Finns. My grandfather fought in both wars and lost two of his brothers – both missing in action.

      Really happy to hear that you enjoyed the film. Wishing you all the best!

    4. It was a peace treaty Finland signed and the demands were worse than what the Soviet Union initially asked + reperations for damages, which was pretty bad.
      You can't really know if they would've annexed Finland if they just agreed on the territorial demands initially without a fight like baltics and other countries, I'm pretty sure Finland kept it's independence due to the sacrafice.
      No it wasn't agreement to fight Germans in northern Russia it was every German out of Finland there wasn't that much fighting but it did result in some casualties.

    5. I believe the reason why the Finns dug in on the "wrong" side of the river, was because they were supposed to delay the russians long enough to get all the equipment across first. The engineers would set up the charges to blow up the bridge once the russians were close, but blew it too early.

    6. Unknown soldier is like a Holy Saga to us Finns. This third version is good and realistic. But I would still prefer the Rukajärven Tie movie. It is more deep and not trying to tell the whole 5-6 years history. (Tie does not mean tie. It means road 😊)

    7. My grandma is one of the old Karelians. She was 9 when Winter War happened, and then they had to leave again during 44 when the big push came. Never got to go back home after that.
      I went to see this movie with her when it came out. Those scenes showing off the home life at the farm weren't part of the book, but it was a nice addition and very much the reality for many. You can imagine it was quite emotional to sit next to someone who had lived that as a child, having to leave home not once but twice.

    8. They're not Russian helmets. They're Finnish steel helmets that were modeled after the Swedish. Not all Finnish troops wore Stahlhelms during the continuation war.

    9. "…pushed back to the borders which were set after the winter war"" – Not exactly. The VKT-line held after the victories in Tali and Ihantala right up to the ceasefire. Finnish troops withdrew only after the fighting as per one of the conditions.

    10. @JayRetroReactions You might also want to get your hands on Tuntematon Sotilas movie from year 1955. Many of people in that production actually were fighting in that war. Finland lost Petsamo and Karelia in peace treaty plus some other minor areas. Both were pretty heavy losses to industry and Karelia for farming so much so it feels even today.

    11. The Winter War was such a heartbreak for the Finnish people, because everyone "knew" there was no winning the war. Yet people fought anyway. Then, during the Continuation War, it seemed there was light at the end of the tunnel. A chance that the "eternal enemy" might be extinguished. And then it happens again – the feeling of no victory returns and the loss is bitter indeed.

    12. In this film,the Finns invaded East Karelia…there are some roads etc..because of that,not much armor was udes,etc…on the Karelian Isthmus,on the other hand,more tanks were used,etc..Finland have one armoured division..

    13. The movie is based on a book of the same name: Tuntematon sotilas by Väinö Linna and there’s also an earlier black/white version from 1950s of the same name made rather soon after the book publishing.👌

    14. Don't use this film as a source of information regarding the order of battle of the Finnish Army.

      The most powerful campaign in the summer of 1944 by the Red Army was fought in June and July 1944 in the Karelian Isthmus. The battles of Tali-Ihantala, Äyräpää and Viipurinlahti were were the Soviet Fourth Strategic Strike culminated.

      The massed use of artillery and bomber aircraft played a crucial role. Artillery was indispensable in The Battle of Tali-Ihantala in particular. The Finnish artillery had developed the Fire Control Circle, a simple mechanical device which allowed for a spotter to request fire support without knowing where the guns were positioned. In Tali-Ihantala, the Finnish Army had a total of 250 guns at its disposal, capable of being quickly directed to fire on a single target.There was one case where there was intelligence on the exact starting moment of a Soviet armored division, which is when they were hit with everything and the attack never materialized. The German dive bomber unit Detachment Kuhlmey also played an important role in destroying Red Army logistics and command centers in the rear.

      You might be interested in this documentary:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH2QibXRsUw

    15. Antti Rokka = Viljam Pylkäs.
      And in the movie Rokka kills 52 soviets on the field with his machine gun KP31.

      Actually Pylkäs killed 76 with the same armour. There were 45 full loaded magazine and no man to load.

    16. Koskela is usually seen as reasonable officer. As opposed to Lammio, the one who wanted to give inappropriate punishment. And, yes, there was Finnish Air Force but they spent most of their time fighting Sturmoviks and Soviet bombers.

    17. And Antti Rokka did survive the story like the person he is based on. In the novel he jokes that now he is going to be sent back to his family to see if there is new baby.

    18. Oddly I was suprised visiting your land where they refer to me as a Finns as a russians. I lived in England, Nottinghan for 4 years and never had that bother showed in my face. I was and still am offended…deeply.

    Leave A Reply